Part of
Earlier North American Englishes
Edited by Merja Kytö and Lucia Siebers
[Varieties of English Around the World G66] 2022
► pp. 123146
Berman, A.
1970Agent, experiencer, and controllability. In Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, Report NSF-24, S. Kuno (ed.), 203–237. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
, see Davies 2010Google Scholar
Cuyckens, H. & d’Hoedt, F.
2015Variability in clausal verb complementation: The case of admit . In Perspectives of Complementation. Structure, Variation and Boundaries, M. Höglund, P. Rickman, J. Rudanko & J. Havu (eds), 77–100. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
2010– The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL].
2012Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400 million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7: 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D.
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1968The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, E. Bach & R. Harms (eds), 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gruber, J.
1967Look and see. Language 43: 937–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M.
2004Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 8: 47–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1940A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part V: Syntax, Volume IV. Reprinted 1961. London and Copenhagen: George Allen and Unwin/Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G.
1980Accustomed to swim: Accustomed to swimming. On verbal forms after TO. In ALVAR: A Linguistically Varied Assortment of Readings. Studies Presented to Alvard Ellegård on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday [Stockholm Papers in English Language and Literature 1], J. Allwood & M. Ljung (eds), 75–99. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C. & Smith, N.
2009Change in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, M.
2007Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Second edition). Volume II: Complex Constructions, T. Shopen (ed.), 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, P.
1994Contrasting extraction types. Journal of Linguistics 30: 156–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, A.
1997Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, G.
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7 (2): 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, C. Dalton-Puffer, D. Kastovsky, N. Ritt & H. Schendl (eds), 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R.
2002Nouniness. In Fuzzy Grammar, B. Aarts, D. Denison, E. Keizer & G. Popova (eds), 351–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rudanko, J.
2006Watching English grammar change. English Language and Linguistics 10: 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Changes in Complementation in British and American English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Linking Form and Meaning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Infinitives and Gerunds in Recent English. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.
2003Meaning and context. In Motivation in Language: Studies in Honour of Günter Radden, H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K. Panther (eds), 27–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vosberg, U.
2003aThe role of extractions and horror æqui in the evolution of -ing complements in Modern English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (eds), 305–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003bCognitive complexity and the establishment of -ing constructions with retrospective verbs in Modern English. In Insights into Late Modern English, M. Dossena & C. Jones (eds), 197–220. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006Die Große Komplementverschiebung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar