Cover not available
Part of
Earlier North American Englishes
Edited by Merja Kytö and Lucia Siebers
[Varieties of English Around the World G66] 2022
► pp. 231–258

Dialects as a mirror of historical trajectories

Canadian English across Ontario (North America)

| University of Toronto
A multi-year project on dialects in Ontario, Canada demonstrates how synchronic variation mirrors historical trajectories of change. Three linguistic features are examined, come vs. came, adjectives of smallness and 3rd person male referents. Using quantitative methods and a comparative sociolinguistic approach, I demonstrate how these features vary by geographical location, date of birth and social and linguistic factors. Some features are stable, providing a foundation of constancy. Other features are changing but are distinguished by locale. Changes are advancing most vigorously in the urban centre, while conservative variants persist in peripheral locations. The results highlight how synchronic dialect data can expose diachronic trends in contemporary English and provide a window on earlier varieties.
Keywords: English dialects, Ontario, Canada, variation, change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Three case studies
    • 2.1Preterit come
      • 2.1.1Introduction
      • 2.1.2Methodology
      • 2.1.3Results
    • 2.2Adjectives of smallness
      • 2.2.1Introduction
      • 2.2.2Methodology
      • 2.2.3Results
    • 2.3Third person male
      • 2.3.1Introduction
      • 2.3.2Methodology
      • 2.3.3Results
  • 3.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g66.10tag
References (41)
References
Andersen, H. 1988. Center and periphery: Adoption, diffusion, and spread. In Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, J. Fisiak (ed.), 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, R. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Amsterdam and New York: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atwood, E. B. 1953. A Survey of Verb Forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boberg, C. 2000. Geolinguistic diffustion and the U.S.-Canada border. Language Variation and Change 12: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bynon, T. 1977. Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1995. The Canada - U.S. border as a vanishing isogloss: The evidence of chesterfield . Journal of English Linguistics 23: 155–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. An introduction to Dialect Topography. English World-Wide 15: 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill, P. 1980. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. Edwards, V. & Whittle, P. 1989. Urban British dialect grammar: The question of dialect levelling. English World-Wide 10: 185–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cukor-Avila, P. 1997. Change and stability in the use of verbal ‑s over time in AAVE. In Englishes around the World, E. W. Schneider (ed.), 295–306. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, S. & Fee, M. 2017. DCHP-2: Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles . [URL]. (23 January 2022)
Dubinsky, K. 1993. Improper Advances: Rape and Heterosexual Conflict in Ontario, 1880–1929. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eisikovits, E. 1987. Variation in the lexical verb in Inner-Sydney English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 7: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, H. H. 1986. Principles of Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jankowski, B. & Tagliamonte, S. A. 2017. A lost Canadian dialect: The Ottawa Valley 1975–2013. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics, T. Säily, A. Nurmi, M. Palander-Collin & A. Auer (eds), 239–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. & Tagliamonte, S. A. 2004. From Somerset to Samaná: Pre-verbal did in the voyage of English. Language Variation and Change 16: 93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, S. F. 2004. Dude. American Speech 79: 281–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
2003. Pursuing the cascade model. In Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill, D. Britain & J. Cheshire (eds), 9–23. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83: 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, A. M. S. 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary. 1989. 2nd edition. J. Simpson (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Orton, H., Sanderson, S. & Widdowson, J. 1978. The Linguistic Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Paddock, H. 1982. Newfoundland dialects of English. In Languages in Newfoundland and Labrador, H. Paddock (ed.), 71–89. St John’s, Newfoundland: Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
1984. Mapping lexical variants in Newfoundland English. In Papers of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association, H. Hobl (ed.), 84–103. Moncton: University of Moncton.
Padolsky, E. & Pringle, I. 1981. A Historical Source Book for the Ottawa Valley. Ottawa: LSOV.Google Scholar
1984. Demographic analysis and regional dialect surveys in Canada: Data collection and use. Papers in Canadian Rural History IV: 275–276.
Pringle, I., Jones, C. S. & Padolsky, E. 1981. Misapprehension of Ottawa urban standards in an adjacent rural area. English World Wide 2: 165–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pringle, I. & Padolsky, E. 1981. The Irish heritage of the English of the Ottawa Valley. English Studies in Canada 7: 338–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983. The linguistic survey of the Ottawa Valley. American Speech 58 (4): 325–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984. Demographic analysis and regional dialect surveys in Canada: Data collection and use. Canadian Papers in Rural History IV: 240–276.
Szmrecsanyi, B. 2013. Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. 2001. Come/came variation in English dialects. American Speech 76: 42–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013–2018. Social Determinants of Linguistic Systems. Insight Grant: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. # 435-2013-0065.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & Denis, D. 2014. Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90: 90–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tidholm, H. 1979. The Dialect of Egton in North Yorkshire. Gothenburg: Bokmaskine.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. 1972. Linguistic change and diffusion. Language in Society 3: 229–252.Google Scholar
1973. Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3: 215–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984. Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Franco, Karlien & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2021. InterestingFellowor Tough OldBird?. American Speech 96:2 ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.