Creole and power
A Critical Discourse Analysis of legal cross‑examinations in ICE Jamaica and ICE Trinidad and Tobago
The paper presents a Critical Discourse Analysis of Jamaican and Trinidadian legal-cross examinations, using data from the International Corpus of English. Although English is the dominant language of the courtroom, the analysis shows that Creole is used by both attorneys and witnesses. In contrast to previous associations of Creole with powerlessness and Standard English with power, attorneys make use of both varieties to exert their authority in the courtroom. Hence, the value of specific linguistic resources and who can use them for which purpose depends on the speakers’ social and institutional positionality. On a methodological level, the paper demonstrates that the International Corpus of English provides valuable data for critical qualitative analyses of language variation in New Englishes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Language and law in Jamaica and Trinidad
- 3.Critical discourse analysis
- 4.Data and method
- 5.Results
- 5.1Use of standard English
- 5.2Use of Creole
- 5.3Questions
- 5.4Reformulation
- 6.Conclusion: Creole and power
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
References (45)
References
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, & Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, Allan. 1992. “Hit and Miss: Referee Design in the Dialects of New Zealand Television Advertisements.” Language and Communication 12 (3/4): 327–340. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Aditi. 2020. “Exploring the Englishes of World Politics.” World Englishes 39 (4): 544–549. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boodoosingh, Ronnie K. 2013. The Complete Advocate. Bloomington: Xlibris Corporation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breeze, Ruth. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis and its Critics.” Pragmatics 21 (4): 493–525.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Winnie. 2012. “Corpus-Based Linguistic Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis.” The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol Chapelle, 1–8. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deuber, Dagmar. 2014. English in the Caribbean: Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Devonish, Hubert, & Ewart A. C. Thomas. 2012. “Standards of English in the Caribbean.” Standards of English: Codified Varieties around the World, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 179–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehrlich, Susan. 2011. “Courtroom Discourse.” The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, eds. by Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone, & Paul Kerswill, 361–374. Los Angeles: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forrester, Clive R. 2014. “Converting Time Reference in Judges’ Summations: A Study in Time Reference Management in a Creole Continuum Courtroom.” International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 21 (2): 225–250. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, Michel. 1978. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jamaican Language Unit. 2005. “The Language Attitude Survey of Jamaica.” <[URL]> (21 May 2021).
James, Winford, & Valerie Youssef. 2004. “The Creoles of Trinidad and Tobago: Morphology and Syntax.” A Handbook of Varieties of English, eds. by Bernd Kortmann, & Edgar Schneider, 454–481. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, Bernd, & Edgar Schneider (eds). 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luchjenbroers, June. 1997. “‘In Your Own Words…’: Questions and Answers in a Supreme Court Trial.” Journal of Pragmatics 27: 477–503. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2015. “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to CDA.” Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed, eds. by Ruth Wodak, & Michael Meyer, 155–180. Los Angeles: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mühleisen, Susanne. 2001. “Is ‘Bad English’ Dying Out?: A Diachronic Comparative Study of Attitudes towards Creole Versus Standard English in Trinidad.” PhiN 15: 43–78.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rickford, John R., & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1985. “Symbol of Powerlessness and Degeneracy, or Symbol of Solidarity and Truth?: Paradoxical Attitudes toward Pidgins and Creoles.” The English Language Today, ed. by Sidney Greenbaum, 252–261. Oxford: Pergamon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rickford, John R., & Sharese King. 2016. “Language and Linguistics on Trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and Other Vernacular Speakers) in the Courtroom and Beyond.” Language 92 (4): 948–988. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robertson, Ian E., & Sandra R. Evans. 2019. “Systemic Linguistic Discrimination and Disenfranchisement in the Creolophone Caribbean: The Case of the St. Lucian Legal System.” The Routledge Companion to the Work of John R. Rickford, eds. by Renée Blake, & Isabelle Buchstaller, 46–51. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shepherd, Rajendra. 2019. Constructing a Prime Minister: A Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of Newspaper Editorials in Trinidad and Tobago. PhD dissertation, University of the West Indies, St Augustine.
Stubbs, Michael. 1997. “Whorf’s Children: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).” British Studies in Applied Linguistics 12: 100–116.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wassink, Alicia B. 1999. “Historic Low Prestige and Seeds of Change: Attitudes toward Jamaican Creole.” Language in Society 28 (1): 57–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weber, Max. 1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der Verstehenden Soziologie, 5th ed. Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Guyanne, Michael Westphal, Johanna Hartmann, & Dagmar Deuber. 2017. “The Use of Question Tags in Different Text Types of Trinidadian English.” World Englishes 36 (4): 726–743. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winford, Donald. 1997. “Re-Examining Caribbean English Creole Continua.” World Englishes 16 (2): 233–279. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth, & Michael Meyer. 2015. “Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed, eds. by Ruth Wodak, & Michael Meyer, 1–33. Los Angeles: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Youssef, Valerie. 2005. “Varilingualism: A Discrete Sub-Type of Language Competence.” Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 3 (3): 216–226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Dan, Bernard
2024.
Disability creole: Can we speak a common biopsychosocial language?.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.