Cover not available
Part of
The Politics of Multilingualism: Europeanisation, globalisation and linguistic governance
Edited by Peter A. Kraus and François Grin
[Studies in World Language Problems 6] 2018
► pp. 223–244

Chapter 10
Languages, norms and power in a globalised context

 | University of Amsterdam
An important branch of linguistics, namely, sociolinguistics, considers “languages” as normative social constructs and not as fixed communication tools characterised by an identifiable set of core features. The latter position was defended in the early sociolinguistic studies of Joshua Fishman on language decline and maintenance in the second half of the twentieth century and in the influential work on generative grammar of Noam Chomsky. In contradiction or contrast to this position, today’s sociolinguistics, which I will refer to as “mainstream sociolinguistics” in this chapter, claims that, in the default case, languages have no fixed boundaries and that they are, in fact, “fluid”. The main argument which mainstream sociolinguistics puts forward to support this claim is that the output of speech production, i.e., referred to as “languaging”, taps from linguistic resources and not from identifiable languages. This chapter argues against this theory. Firstly, multilingual phenomena, including hybrid varieties of global English and hybrid expressions in linguistic landscapes, including that of the Dutch city of Utrecht which claimed to support the languaging-approach, are, in fact, traditional cases of code-switching and code-mixing involving identifiable languages. Secondly, the languaging-approach, in contrast to the languages-approach, makes the wrong predictions. The absence of identifiable languages predicts the “flattening” of linguistic power relations. However, it will be argued that, even in a linguistically highly diverse context, a re-arrangement of power relations between languages takes place and that language hierarchies pop up. Hence, the theory which recognises individual languages makes the correct predictions. Thus, there is no reason to abandon the language concept of early sociolinguistics or Chomskyan linguistics that languages, or at least some modules of language, especially in the domain of semantics and pragmatics, are socially constructed, but that, at the same time, they are characterised by a prototypical grammatical and lexical basic core.
Keywords: languages, normative constructs, languaging, code-switching, linguistic diversity, power, globalisation
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Languages
  • 2.Languaging
  • 3.Global English
  • 4.Multilingual landscape
  • 5.Multilingualism and power
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.6.10mar
References (62)
References
Backus, Ad (2012). Code-switching, accessed 14 June 2014, available at: [URL].Google Scholar
Backus, Ad, Durk Gorter, Karlfried Knapp, Rosita Schjerve-Rindler, Jos Swanenberg, Jan D. ten Thije and Eva Vetter (2013), “Inclusive Multilingualism: Concepts, Modes and Implications”, European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2013: 1 (2): 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). “The Chronicles of Complexity: Ethnography, Superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes”, Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies Paper 29. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
(2013). “Language and the Study of Diversity”, Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies Paper 74. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Ben Rampton (2011). “Language and Superdiversities” – An online journal published by UNESCO & MPIMMG, 13 (2): 1–21, available at: [URL], last accessed 15 June 2014.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Calvet, Louis-Jean (1998). Language Wars and Linguistic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Towards and Ecology of World Languages. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2002). On Nature and Language, edited by Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). The Essential Chomsky, edited by Anthony Arnove. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Csata, Zsombor (2016). “Linguistic Justice and English as a Lingua Franca from a Minority Perspective: The Case of the Hungarians in Transylvania”, Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies, 9 (1): 83–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Décsy, Gyula (1973). Die linguistische Struktur Europas: Vergangenheit, Gegewart, Zukunft. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Du Nay, André (1977). The Early History of the Rumanian Language (Edward Sapir Monograph Series in Language, Culture, and Cognition 3). Lake Bluff: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, John (2012). Multilingualism. Understanding Linguistic Diversity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
García, Ofelia, Rakhmiel Peltz and Harold Schiffman (2006). Language Loyalty, Continuity and Change: Joshua A. Fishman’s Contributions to International Sociolinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamel, Rainer Enrique (2005). Language Empires, Linguistic Imperialism, and the Future of Global Languages, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Department of Anthropology México, D.F., available at: [URL], last accessed 16 June 2014Google Scholar
Heller, Monica (2011). Paths to Post-Nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, Robert J. (2011). Globalization and the Nation-state. Second Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hülmbauer, Cornelia (2011a). English as a Lingua Franca (ELF), available at: [URL], last accessed 14 June 2014.Google Scholar
(2011b). Lingua franca, available at: [URL], last accessed 14 June 2014.Google Scholar
Iriberri, Nagore, and José-Ramón Uriarte (2012). “Minority Languages and the Stability of bilingual Equilibria”, Rationality and Society, 24 (4): 442–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, Esa (2008). “The Central Role of Normativity in Language and in Linguistics”, in: Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinka and Esa Itkonen (eds), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, pp. 279–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ives, Peter (2015). “Global English and the Limits of Liberalism: Confronting Global Capitalism and Challenges to the Nation-State”, in: Thomas Ricento (ed.), Language Policy & Political Economy: English in a Global Context, pp. 248–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssens, Rudi (2013). Meertaligheid als cement van de stedelijke samenleving: een analyse van de Brusselse taalsituatie op basis van Taalbarometer 3. Brussels: VUBPRESS Brussels University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David Cassels (2013). Language Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Jens Normann (ed.) (2011). “A Toolkit for Transnational Communication in Europe”, Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism, Vol. 64. University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Humanities.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Jens Normann, and Kasper Juffermans (2012a). Languaging, available at: [URL], last accessed 14 June 2014.Google Scholar
. (2012b). Superdiversity, available at: [URL], last accessed 14 June 2014.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Jens, Rosita Rindler-Schjerve and Eva Vetter (2012). Polylingualism, Multilingualism, and Plurilingualism, available at: [URL], last accessed 14 June 2014.Google Scholar
Kimura, Goro Christoph (2011). “Eine Typologie interlingualer Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten”, in: Cyril Brosch and Sabine Fiedler (eds), Florilegium Interlinguisticum: Festschrift für Detlev Blanke zum 70. Geburtstag, pp. 29–46. Frankfurt aM: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kloet, Jeroen de (2014). Looking for a Gown – Creative Production in a Mimetic World. Inaugural address, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kraus, Peter A. (2012). “The Politics of Complex Diversity: A European Perspective”, Ethnicities, 12 (1): 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey (2002). The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maly, Ico, Jan Blommaert and Joaschim Ben Yakoub (2014). Superdiversiteit en democratie. Berchem: EPO.Google Scholar
Marácz, László (2011). “Hybridity as a Characteristic Feature of Globalization”, in: Jóla Róka (ed.), Globalization, Europeanization and other Transnational Phenomena: Description, Analyses and Generalizations, pp. 14–30. Budapest: Budapest College of Communication and Business.Google Scholar
(2014). “The Politics of Multilingual Communication: Case Studies and Research Agendas”, in: Sarah Craze and Frieder Lempp (eds), Communicating Conflict: A Multi-disciplinary Perspective, pp. 45–61. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar
(2016). “The Roots of Modern Hungarian Nationalism: A Case Study and a Research Agenda”, in: Lotte Jensen (ed.), The Roots of Nationalism: National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe, 1600–1815, pp. 235–250. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Mar-Molinero, Clare, and Miranda Stewart (eds.) (2009). Globalization and Language in the Spanish-speaking World: Macro and Micro Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, Stephen (2012). Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language. Second Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. (2012). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okuka, Miloš (1998). Eine Sprache viele Erben: Sprachpolitik als Nationalisierungsinstrument in Ex-Jugoslavien. Klagenfurt: Wieser Verlag.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Robert (2006). English-only Europe?: Challenging Language Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2009). Linguistic Imperialism Continued. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012). “How to strengthen the Sociolinguistics of Globalization: A Review Article based on Challenges in the Sociolinguistics of Globalization”, Critical Discourse Studies, 9 (4): 407–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). “Multilingual Europe: Multilingual Europeans”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21 (2): 315–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pieterse, Jan Nederveen (2009). Globalization and Culture. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan, and Bernard Grofman (1984). “Language as Political Control: Newspeak Revisited”, Paper Prepared for the 1984 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , Washington DC, 30 August to 2 September 1984.
Pool, Jonathan (1990). “Language Regimes and Political Regimes”, in: Brian Weinstein (ed.), Language Policy and Political Development, pp. 241–261. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert (2007). “E pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century”, Scandinavian Political Studies, 30 (2): 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ricento, Thomas (ed.) (2006). An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2015). Language Policy & Political Economy: English in a Global Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rindler Schjerve, Rosita, and Eva Vetter (2012). European Multilingualism: Current Perspectives and Challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Safran, William (2004). “Introduction: The Political Aspects of Language”, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 10 (1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara (2013). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca: A Complete Introduction to the Theoretical Nature and Practical Implications of English used as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sonntag, Selma K., and Linda Cardinal (2015). “Introduction: State Traditions and Language Regimes: Conceptualizing Language Policy Choices”, in: Linda Cardinal and Selma K. Sonntag (eds), State Traditions and Language Regimes, pp. 3–27. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard (2009). Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steger, Manfred B. (2009). Globalization: A very short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swaan, Abram de (2001). Words of the World: The Global Language System. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Peter J. (2009). Kampf der Sprachen: Die Europäische Union von der sprachlichen Zerreißprobe. Hamburg: Krämer.Google Scholar
Witte, Els, and Harry Van Velthoven (2011). Languages in Contact and in Conflict: The Belgian Case. Kalmthout: Uitgeverij Pelckmans.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Becker, Anna
2024.  ‘English [as a lingua franca ] is absolutely out of question!’ – The struggle between globalization and (neo-)nationalist traditions in Switzerland’s secondary schools . Language and Education 38:3 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Ives, Peter
2024. Language Regimes, Global English, and National Public Education. In States of Language Policy, ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Becker, Anna & Alex Knoll
2022. Establishing multiple languages in early childhood. Heritage languages and language hierarchies in German-English daycare centers in Switzerland.. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:7 ► pp. 2561 ff. DOI logo
Moraru, Mirona
2020. Toward a Bourdieusian theory of multilingualism. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 17:2 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Levels of Governance. In States of Language Policy, ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.