Part of
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 189202
References (24)
References
Bierwisch, M. (1972). Schriftstruktur und Phonologie [Writing structure and phonology]. Probleme und Ergebnisse der Psychologie, 43, 21–44.Google Scholar
Carney, E. (1994). A survey of English spelling. London, New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vries, J. (1971). Nederlands etymologisch woordenboek [Dutch etymological dictionary]. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, P. (1988). Über die Autonomie der graphematischen Analyse [On the autonomy of graphematic analysis]. In D. Nerius & G. Augst (Eds.), Probleme der geschriebenen Sprache (pp. 25–35).Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften (Linguistische Studien Reihe A 173).Google Scholar
. (2006). Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik[A sketch of German grammar]. Band 1, Das Wort (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, N. (2005). Orthografie [Orthography]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gallmann, P. (1986). The graphic elements of German written language. In G. Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 43–79). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heemskerk, J.S.M., & Van Heuven, V.J. (1993). MORPA, a MORphological PArser for a Dutch text-to-speech system. In V.J. van Heuven & L.C.W. Pols (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis of speech, towards high-quality text-to-speech generation (pp. 67–85). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L.M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 4, 37–92.Google Scholar
Kager, R., & Zonneveld, W. (1986). Schwa, syllables and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review, 5, 197–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neef, M. (2005). Die Graphematik des Deutschen [German graphematics]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4, 214–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neijt, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2003). Verpleegsters, ambassadrices and masseuses. Stratum differences in the comprehension of Dutch words with feminine agent suffixes. In P. Fikkert & L. Cornips (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003 (pp. 117–127)Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunn, A.M. (1998). Dutch orthography: A systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Nunn, A., & Van Heuven, V.J. (1993). MORPHON: Lexicon-based text-to-phoneme conversion and phonological rules. In V.J. van Heuven & L.C.W. Pols (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis of speech, towards high-quality text-to-speech generation, (pp. 87–99). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sproat, R. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, P.A.F., & Van der Sijs, N. (1990). Etymologisch woordenboek, de herkomst van onze woorden [Etymological dictionary, the origin of our words]. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.Google Scholar
Van Heuven, V.J., Neijt, A.H., & Hijzelendoorn, M. (1994). Automatische indeling van Nederlandse woorden op basis van etymologische filters [Automatic classification of Dutch words on the basis of etymological filters]. Spektator, 23(4), 279–291.Google Scholar
Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Wijk, N. (1980 [1912]). Franck’s etymologisch woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal [Franck’s etymological dictionary of the Dutch language]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Venezky, R. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). The American way of spelling. New York/London: Guilford.Google Scholar
Weingarten, R. (2011). Comparative graphematics. In S.R. Borgwaldt & T. Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zuidema, J., & Neijt, A. (2012). Verkennend onderzoek naar de wenselijkheid en de haalbaarheid van een verrijking van de Woordenlijst Nederlandse Taal ten behoeve van spellingonderwijs. Rapport in opdracht van de Nederlandse Taalunie [An exploratory investigation of the advisability and feasibility of an enrichment of the official Dutch spelling for the benefit of spelling education. Report by order of the Dutch Language Union]. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Retrievable from [URL]Google Scholar