Part of
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phoneticsEdited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 230–245
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 230–245
Cross-regional differences in the perception of fricative devoicing
In Dutch, onset /v/ is becoming voiceless. Regional differences have been
observed in the degree of devoicing and in the acoustic implementation of the
/v/–/f/ contrast. We test whether these regional differences – reflecting different
stages of the change in progress – are reflected in perception. We present
the results of a speeded categorization task of stimuli that were systematically
varied for periodicity and duration. Listeners were selected in three regions:
West-Flanders (incipient phase), Randstad (intermediate phase) and Groningen
(advanced phase). Twenty participants per region categorized 405 stimuli as v
or f. Periodicity is a strong cue in all regions, duration only plays a minor role.
Regional differences show up in the degree of categoricity and in uncertainty.
References (15)
Boersma, P., & Hamann, S. (2008). The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology, 25, 217–270. 
Feldman, N., Griffiths, T., & Morgan, J. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4), 752–782.
Goldinger, S. (1997). Words and voices-perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In K. Johnson & J. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 33–66). San Diego: Academic Press.
Guenther, F., & Gjaja, M. (1996). The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1111–1121.
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego: Academic Press.
Kendall, T. & V. Fridland (2012). Variation in the production and perception of mid front vowels in the US Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 289–306.
Kissine, M., Van de Velde, H., & Van Hout, R. (2003). The devoicing of fricatives in Standard Dutch. In P. Fikkert & L. Cornips (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003 (pp. 93–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuhl, P. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.
Mittlerer, H. (2009). Research stuff. Retrieved from [URL].
Slis, I., & Cohen, A. (1969). On complex regulating voiced–voiceless distinction. Language and Speech, 12, 80–102.
Slis I., & Van Heugten, M. (1989). Voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch fricatives. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 6, 123–132.
Van den Berg, R. (1989). Perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: Covariation of voicing cues. Speech Communication, 8, 17–25.
Van der Harst, S. (2011). The vowel space Paradox. A sociophonetic study on Dutch. Utrecht: LOT dissertation.
Van de Velde, H., Gerritsen, M., & Van Hout, R. (1996). The devoicing of fricatives in standard Dutch. A real time study based on radio recordings. Language Variation and Change, 8(2), 149–175.
Van Heuven, V.J., & Van Houten, E. (1989). Vowel labeling consistency as a measure of familiarity with the phonetic code of a language or dialect. In M.E.H. Schouten, & P. Th. van Reenen (Eds.), New methods in dialectology (pp. 121–130). Dordrecht: Foris.