Part of
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 230245
References (15)
References
Boersma, P., & Hamann, S. (2008). The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology, 25, 217–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, N., Griffiths, T., & Morgan, J. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4), 752–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldinger, S. (1997). Words and voices-perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In K. Johnson & J. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 33–66). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guenther, F., & Gjaja, M. (1996). The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1111–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, T. & V. Fridland (2012). Variation in the production and perception of mid front vowels in the US Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M., Van de Velde, H., & Van Hout, R. (2003). The devoicing of fricatives in Standard Dutch. In P. Fikkert & L. Cornips (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003 (pp. 93–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittlerer, H. (2009). Research stuff. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Slis, I., & Cohen, A. (1969). On complex regulating voiced–voiceless distinction. Language and Speech, 12, 80–102.Google Scholar
Slis I., & Van Heugten, M. (1989). Voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch fricatives. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 6, 123–132.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, R. (1989). Perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: Covariation of voicing cues. Speech Communication, 8, 17–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Harst, S. (2011). The vowel space Paradox. A sociophonetic study on Dutch. Utrecht: LOT dissertation.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, H., Gerritsen, M., & Van Hout, R. (1996). The devoicing of fricatives in standard Dutch. A real time study based on radio recordings. Language Variation and Change, 8(2), 149–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Heuven, V.J., & Van Houten, E. (1989). Vowel labeling consistency as a measure of familiarity with the phonetic code of a language or dialect. In M.E.H. Schouten, & P. Th. van Reenen (Eds.), New methods in dialectology (pp. 121–130). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar