Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 153–184

Chapter 6. Formation and function of the simple present in conversational L2 Russian

| University of Alaska Fairbanks
Much research involving the second language (L2) acquisition of tense-aspect systems has focused on the acquisition of past tense (e.g. Ayoun 2005; Bardovi-Harlig 2000; Salaberry 2008), with relatively few studies emphasizing the L2 acquisition of non-past features. The present study investigates the conversational production of present tense forms in L2 Russian (L1 English) by means of a prototype account (Li & Shirai 2000; Shirai & Andersen 1995). Data from conversational interviews (n=33) were examined in order to address the questions of which present tense functions are more and less prototypical among L2 learners of Russian, as well as how the learners produce the morphological endings of the simple present. Some patterns reflected in the data show that learners of all proficiency levels regard the expression of a present state and the habitual present as most prototypical, while reference to immediate future and the historical present are less prototypical. The data also illustrate examples of lower-proficiency learners producing the highest number of morphological errors as well as using the present tense in situations that are not compatible with present tense usage in English or Russian, such as future habitual and past reference. Implications for pedagogical practices in the teaching of the present tense in L2 Russian are discussed.
Published online: 9 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.06mar
References (35)
References
Ayoun, D. 2005. The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (eds), 79–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bar-Shalom, E. 2002. Tense and aspect in early child Russian. Language Acquisition 10(4): 321–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1997. Another piece of the puzzle: The emergence of the present perfect. Language Learning 47: 375–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Canales Viquez, A. 2010. Acquisition of Tense-aspect Morphology in English by Native Speakers of Costa Rican Spanish: The Case of Simple Present and Present Progressive. MA thesis, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Boston MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. 1995. Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17(3): 379–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, J. 1970. A Grammar of Aspect: Usage and meaning in the Russian verb. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gabriele, A. & Canales, A. 2011. No time like the present: Examining transfer at the interfaces in second language acquisition. Lingua 121: 670–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagarina, N. 2004. Does the acquisition of aspect have anything to do with aspectual pairs? ZAS Papers in Linguistics 33: 39–61.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. 2010. On covert tense-aspect restructuring in heritage Russian: A case of aspectually transient predicates. In Proceedings of the 2009 Mind/Context Divide Workshop, M. Iverson, I. Ivanov, T. Judy, J. Rothman, R. Slabakova & M. Tryzna (eds), 72–83. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Leary, A. 2000. Acquiring Russian tense-aspect: opaque input for L2 learners. In Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum, B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. Anderson, C. Klee & E. Tarone (eds), 98–122. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lekic, M., Davidson, D., Gor, K. & American Council of Teachers of Russian. 2008. Russian Stage One: Live from Russia: Volume 1. Dubuque IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. 2000. The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, J. 2003. Interference in the second language acquisition of the present simple tense. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 13: 1–28.Google Scholar
. 2010. Interference in the acquisition of the present perfect continuous: Implications of a grammaticality judgment test. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 3: 24–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lubensky, S., Ervin, G., McClellan, L. & Jarvis, D. 2001. Nachalo. New York NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Martelle, W. 2011. Testing the Aspect Hypothesis in L2 Russian. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Muftah, M. & Rafik-Galea, S. 2013. Error analysis of present simple tense in the interlanguage of adult Arab English language learners. English Language Teaching 6(2): 146–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nossalik, L. 2008. L2 acquisition of Russian outer aspect. In Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007), R. Slabakova, J. Rothman, P. Kempchinsky & E. Gavruseva (eds), 165–180. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. 2005. Aspect lost, aspect regained: Restructuring of aspectual marking in American Russian. In Aspectual Inquiries, P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (eds), 369–396. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinksy, M. 2008. Without aspect. In Case and Grammatical Relations[Typological Studies in Language 81], G. Corbett & M. Noonan (eds), 263–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Robin, R., Evans-Romaine, K. & Shatalina, G. 2012. Golosa. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Salaberry, R. 2008. Marking Past Tense in Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. 1991. Primacy of Aspect in Language Acquisition: Simplified Input and Prototype. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. 1995. The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71: 743–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2005. What is so difficult about telicity marking in L2 Russian? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8: 63–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoll, S. 1998. The role of Aktionsart in the acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language 18: 351–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Švedova, N. 1980. Russkaja grammatika ( Russian grammar ). Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Nauka.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. 2004. A Reference Grammar of Russian. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Unlu, E.A. & Hatipoglu, Ç. 2012. The acquisition of the copula be in present simple tense in English by native speakers of Russian. System 40: 255–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wade, T. 2000. A Comprehensive Russian Grammar. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yang, S. & Huang, Y.Y. 2004. The impact of the absence of grammatical tense in L1 on the acquisition of the tense-aspect system in L2. IRAL 42: 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaliznjak, E.V. & Šmelev, A.D. 2000. Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju (Introduction to Russian aspectology). Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kultury.Google Scholar