Part of
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 215252
References (59)
References
Andersen, R.W. 1990. Verbal virtuosity and speakers’ purposes. In Variability in Second Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Second Language Research Forum , H. Burmeister & P.L. Rounds (eds), 1–24. Eugene OR: University of Oregon.
. 1991. Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds), 305–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. The insider’s advantage. Italiano: Lingua seconda/lingua straniera (Italian: Second language/foreign language), A. Giacalone Ramat & M. Vedovelli (eds), 1–26. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 527–570. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. 1976. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3: 169–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, M. R. 2008. acquisition of English tense–aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning 58: 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 471–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bergström, A. 1996. The acquisition of tense and aspect in SLA and FLL: A study of learner narratives in English (SL) and French (FL). Canadian Modern Language Review 52: 308–330.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.W. 1995. The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly 29: 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. 1980. The semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflections in child language. Language 56: 386–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J. & Swift, M. 2004. Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 263–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J.-P. & Sinclair, H. 1973. Time, tense, and aspect. Cognition 2: 107–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. 1994. The grammaticization of zero. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], W. Pagliuca (ed.), 235–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. & Shirai, Y. 2010. The development of aspectual marking in Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics 31: 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. 2002. The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning 52: 43–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishida, K. 2007. Developing understanding of how the desu/masu and plain forms express one’s stance. In Selected Papers from the Conference of Pragmatics in the CJK Classroom, 5-7 June 2006, D.R. Yoshimi & H. Wang (eds), 97–120. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Ishida, M. 2004. Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning 54: 311–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J. & Collins, L. 2008. The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense–aspect marking: A comparison of Hispanophone and Anglophone learners of French. The Modern Language Journal 92: 350–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koyama, S. 2003. Nihongo no tensu-asupekuto no syuutoku ni okeru huhensei to kobetusei: bogo no yakuwari to eikyoo o tyuusin ni (Universality and variability in the acquisition of Japanese tense-aspect: focusing on the role and effect of L1). In Gengo to Kyooiku: Nihongo o Taisyoo ni (Language and Education: The Case of Japanese), S. Koyama, M. Nohara & K. Otomo (eds), 415–436. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Lee, E.-J. 2001. Interlanguage development by two Korean speakers of English with a focus on temporality. Language Learning 51: 591–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. 2000. The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Maher, S., Newmark, E. & Hurley, J. 2001. The role of parental input in the acquisition of aspect. Journal of Cognitive Science 2: 119–143.Google Scholar
Martin, S.E. 1988. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. Rutland VT: Charles E. Tuttle.Google Scholar
Maynard, S.K. 1991. Pragmatics of discourse modality: A case of da and desu/masu forms in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 551–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, A.P.D. 1981. Events, processes, and states. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 14: Tense and Aspect, P.J. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (eds), 191–212. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Okuda, Y. 1978. Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte (zyoo) (On the study of aspect (1)). Kyooiku Kokugo (Language Education) 53: 33–44.Google Scholar
Rohde, A. 1996. The Aspect Hypothesis and emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics 34: 1115–1137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Tense and aspect in naturalistic L2 acquisition. In Psycholinguistics on the Threshold of the Year 2000: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of the International Society of Applied Linguistics, M. de Graca Pinto, J. Veloso & B. Maia (eds), 359–363. Porto: University of Portugal.Google Scholar
Robison, R.E. 1990. The primacy of aspect: aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics 16: 344–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryu, J., Horie, K. & Shirai, Y. In press. The L2 Acquisition of the Korean imperfective aspect markers -ko iss- and -a iss- by Japanese learners: A multiple-factor account. Language Learning.
Salaberry, M.R. 1999. The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics 20: 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibata, M. 1998. The use of tense-aspect markers in a Brazilian worker’s Japanese. Bulletin of the Institute for Area Studies of Okinawa University 11: 45–63.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. 1991. Primacy of Aspect in Language Acquisition: Simplified Input and Prototype. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 1993. Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese. In Argument Structure: Its Syntax and Acquisition, H. Nakajima & Y. Otsu (eds), 185–211. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
. 1994. On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input? First Language 14: 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998a. The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition? First Language 18: 281–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 327–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Temporality in first and second language acquisition. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 167–193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011. Lexical and grammatical aspect in language acquisition, processing, and disorders. In Studies in Language Sciences, S. Arita, Y.G. Butler, K. Horie, E. Hauser, Y. Shirai, R. Mazuka & J. Tsubakita (eds), 41–57. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
. 2012. Second language acquisition research and Japanese language teaching: A functionalist approach. Japanese Studies 32: 317–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. W. 1995. The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71: 743–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Kurono, A. 1998. The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning 48: 245–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Nishi, Y. 2002. Lexicalization of aspectual structures in English and Japanese. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat (ed.), 267–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. How what we mean impacts how we talk: The Japanese imperfective aspect marker -teiru in conversation. In The Power of Context in Language Learning and Teaching, J. Frodesen & C. Holten (eds), 39–48. Boston MA: Thomson Heinle.Google Scholar
Smith, C.S. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugaya, N. 2003. Nihongo gakusyuusya no asupekuto syuutoku ni kansuru zyuudan kenkyuu: doosa no zizoku to kekka no zyootai no -te i-ru o tyuusin ni (A longitudinal study on the acquisition of imperfective aspect morphology by L2 learners of Japanese: focusing on the progressive and the resultative state use of -te i-ru). Nihongo Kyooiku (Journal of Japanese Language Teaching) 119: 65–74.Google Scholar
. 2005. Nihongo no asupekuto syuutoku ni kansuru kenkyuu no doukou (An overview of the acquisition of the aspect morphology in Japanese as a second language). Gengo bunka to Nihongo kyouiku 11 gatu tokushuugou ( Language Culture and Japanese Education, November special issue ), 39–67.Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y. 2007. The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Universals, transfer, or multiple factors? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugaya N. & Shirai, Y. 2009. Can L2 learners productively use Japanese tense-aspect markers? A usage-based approach. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations [Typological Studies in Language 82], R. Corrigan, E.A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. Wheatley (eds), 423–444. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J. 1972. The Compositional Nature of the Aspects [Foundations of Language Supplementary Series 15]. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, T. 1976. Gendai Nihongo doosi no asupekuto no kenkyuu (Research on the aspect of verbs in Modern Japanese). In Nihongo doosi no asupekuto ( Aspects of Japanese Verbs ), H. Kindaichi (ed.), 155–327. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kawaguchi, Satomi

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.