Cover not available
Part of
Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by Eliane Segers and Paul van den Broek
[Not in series 206] 2017
► pp. 119–135

The development of Hebrew conjunct constructions in narration

| Tel Aviv University
| Tel Aviv University
The current chapter describes a psycholinguistic study of the development of conjunct constructions, a multi-functional coordinated syntactic structure that lies at the heart of complex Hebrew syntax, which can express variegated content in syntactically complex structures. Conjunct constructions in narratives written by 150 Hebrew-speaking children, adolescents and adults were analyzed in terms of syntactic structure and function, lexical semantics, and discourse functions. Results indicate that this construction emerges as a simplex event-telling form, gaining in complexity and fulfilling more functions with age and schooling level, with a concomitant increase in the interface with other forms of complex syntax. The chapter concludes with an illustration of these developments in two narratives and a discussion of the role of language-specific constructions in language acquisition.
Keywords: syntactic acquisition, coordination, complex syntax, discourse functions, lexical development, narrative development, later language development, Hebrew
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Syntactic development
    • 1.2Complex syntactic constructions
    • 1.3Conjunct constructions
    • 1.4The current study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Quantitative and qualitative analyses
    • 2.2Levels on the scale
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Text size
    • 3.2C-constructions
  • 4.Discussion
  • References
Published online: 21 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.08rav
References (64)
References
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bendavid, A. (1967). Biblical and Mishnaic Hebrew grammar. Tel Aviv: Dvir [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1986). A step-by-step model of language learning. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Re-opening the debate (pp. 191–219). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. (2005). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp. 9–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (in press). Development of complex syntax: From early clause-combining to text- embedded syntactic packaging. In A. Bar-On & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of language disorders. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Berman, R. A., & Lustigman, L. (2014). Emergent clause-combining in adult-child interactional contexts. In I. Arnon, M. Tice, C. Kurumada, & B. Estigarribia (Eds.), Language in interaction (pp. 281–300) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2009). Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In J. Guo, et al. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin (pp. 149–162). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Ravid, D. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 92–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Interpretation and recall of proverbs in three pre-adolescent populations. First Language, 30, 155–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Crosslinguistic perspectives on developing text- production abilities in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5, 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., Nayditz, R., & Ravid, D. (2011). Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations. Written Language and Literacy, 14, 161–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, S-J., Brandt, S., & Kidd, E. (2011). Relative clause acquisition and representation: Evidence from spontaneous speech, sentence repetition, and comprehension. In D. Schoenefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence – discussing and extending the methodological tool-kit of the linguist (pp. 273–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandes, G., & Ravid, D. (2016). Prepositional phrases as manner adverbials in the development of Hebrew L1 text production. In L. Ortega, A. E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 55–74. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Noonan, M. (Eds.). (2001). Complex sentences in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R., & Ruigendijk, E. (2013). The interaction of speech intelligibility and syntactic complexity. Processing speech in noise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 139–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Kuiper, M. S. (2002). Figurative language development research and popular children’s literature: why we should know, “where the wild things are”. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, J., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Children acquire unaccusatives and A-movement very early. In M. Everaert, M. Marelj, & T. Siloni (Eds.), The theta system: Argument structure at the interface (pp. 354–378). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, P. W. (2010). Parataxis and simpler syntax. In M-J. Béguelin,M. Avanzi, & G. Corminboeuf (Eds.), Actes du 1er Colloque International de Macrosyntaxe, Vol. 2. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dasinger, L., & Toupin, C. (1994). The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In R. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 457–514). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Moore, J. (2013). The linguistic challenges of learning across academic disciplines. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 302–322). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., DiNubila, J. A., & Vouloumanos, A. (2006). From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life. Cognition, 100, B10–B20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Aram, D., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Definitions as a window to the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 687–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (2002). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, A. J. (1980). Judges 5: Parataxis in Hebrew poetry. Journal of Biblical Literature, 99, 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2007). Coordination. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol II: Complex constructions (pp. 1–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hebert, M., Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2013). Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 26, 111–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, L. (2014). Conjunct constructions in written narratives across adolescence. MA thesis, Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew]
Jisa, H., & Kern, S. (1998). Relative clauses in French children’s narrative texts. Journal of Child Language, 25, 623–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jisa, H., & Tolchinsky, L. (2009). Developing a depersonalised discourse stance in typologically different languages: Written expository texts. Written Language and Literacy, 12, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E., Sorjonen, M-L., & Helasvuo, M-L. (2007). Discourse structure. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol II: Complex constructions (pp. 301–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48, 171–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1981). Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2007). Measuring written language ability in narrative samples. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 287–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M. A., & Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 788–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M. A., & Scott, C. M. (Eds.). (2009). Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: development and disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. R., Billow, J. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Syntactic development in adolescents with a history of language impairments: A follow-up investigation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 241–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nir, B., & Berman, R. A. (2010). Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 744–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, C., Lieven, E., Iqbal, F., & Theakston, A. (2015). Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive. Journal of Child Language, 43(4), 811–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in written expository texts: Evidence from later language acquisition. In D. Ravid & H. B-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 337–355). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Syntactic complexity in discourse production across different text types. In C. Bolly & L. Degand (Eds.), Across the line of speech and writing variation. Corpora and language in use (pp. 51–66). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2006). Information density in the development of spoken and written narratives in English and Hebrew. Discourse Processes, 41 (2), 117–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school-age: A text- embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language, 30, 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., & Chen-Djemal, Y. (2015). Spoken and written narration in Hebrew: A case study. Written Language and Literacy, 18, 56–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., & Levie, R. (2010). Adjectives in the development of text production: Lexical, morphological and syntactic analyses. First Language, 30, 27–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., & Saban, R. (2008). Syntactic and meta-syntactic skills in the school years: A developmental study in Hebrew. In I. Kupferberg &A. Stavans (Eds.), Language education in Israel: Papers in honor of Elite Olshtain (pp. 75–110). Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Zilberbuch, S. (2003). Morpho-syntactic constructs in the development of spoken and written Hebrew text production. Journal of Child Language, 30, 395–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., van Hell, J., Rosado, E., & Zamora, A. (2002). Subject NP patterning in the development of text production. Written Language and Literacy, 5, 69–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowland, C., & Theakston, A. L. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: A longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: The modals and DO. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 1471–1492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuele, C. M. (2013). Beyond 14 grammatical morphemes: Toward a broader view of grammatical development. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 118–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2012). Linguistic processing in Hebrew-speaking children from low and high SES backgrounds. Reading & Writing, 25, 1427–1448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (1985–1995). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L., & Rowland, C. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: A longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: Auxiliary BE. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 1449–1470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A., Ibbotson, P., Freudenthal, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Productivity of noun slots in verb frames. Cognitive Science, 39, 1369–1395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar