Cover not available
Part of
Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 227–248

Chapter 14
Meaning between algebra and culture

Auto-antonyms in the Ewe verb lexicon

| Department of African Languages and Cultures, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
Semanticists continue to debate questions like: are meanings about “things in the world” or “things in the mind”? Are meanings about algebraic calculations or about cultural conceptions? How are multiple senses of a word related? This chapter explores some of these questions through a detailed semantic analysis of two verbs in Ewe (Gbe), a Kwa language of West Africa. I argue that the senses of the verbs involve directional opposition: mie ‘germinate/dry up’ and dró ‘put load up on/down from head’. As such they are auto-antonyms. From a logical point of view, the interpretations of the verb mie may not look antonymous, but from the perspective of cultural practices and conceptualisations the image schematic representations go in opposite direction. I propose Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM)-inspired semantic representations for the verbs which show the contrasts transparently.
Keywords: auto-antonymy, polysemy, meaning construction, three levels of meaning, placement verbs, directional opposition, converse, reversive, Ewe
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background
    • 1.2Meaning construction: some assumptions
  • 2.Antonymy in language and thought
  • 3.Janus verb words in Ewe
    • 3.1What the Ewe dictionaries say
    • 3.2The verb mie
    • 3.3The verb dró
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.210.14ame
References (47)
References
Adzomada, Kofi J. 1969. A dictionary of Ewe homonyms. Accra: Waterville Press.Google Scholar
1991. Eʋe-Français gɔmeɖegbalẽ [Ewe-French Dictionary, Part Two of Dictionaire Français-Ewe] Fourth Edition. Lome, Togo: Editions HAHO.Google Scholar
Akotey, Klu. 1988. Ku ɖi ƒo na wo. [Death satisfied them]. Accra: Bureau of Ghana Languages.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2003. Prepositions and postpositions in Ewe: empirical and theoretical considerations. In Anne Zibri-Hetz & Patrick Sauzet (eds.) Typologie des langues d’Afrique et universaux de la grammaire, volume 2: benue-kwa, soninke, wolof, 41–67. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2006a. Ewe serial verb constructions in their grammatical context. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & RMW Dxon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: a crosslinguistic typology, 124–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006b. Real descriptions: reflections on native speaker and non-native speaker descriptions of a language. In Ameka Felix K., Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: the standing challenge of grammar writing. 70–112. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & James Essegbey. 2006. Elements of the Ewe grammar of space. In Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space. 362–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ansre, Gilbert. 2000. The Ewe language. In Gavua, Kodzo (ed.), A handbook of Eweland. Volume 2: The northern Ewes of Ghana, 22–47. Accra: Woeli.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas. 2011. Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1975. Aspects of language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bureau of Ghana Languages (BGL). 1971. Đe modzaka 2 [Entertain yourself, Folk tales in Cartoons]. Accra: Bureau of Ghana Languages.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics. (2nd edn.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. Antonymy revisited: Some thoughts on the relationship between words and concepts. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (eds.) Frames, fields, and contrasts: new essays in semantic and lexical organization, 289–306. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2011. Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (3rd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Essegbey, James. 1999. Inherent complement verbs revisited: towards understanding argument structure in Ewe. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. U-semantics, second round. Quaderni di semantica 7(1). 49–58.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Beryl T. Atkins. 1992. Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbours. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization, 75–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Geurts, Kathryn Linn. 2002. Culture and the senses: Bodily ways of knowing in an African community. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. (ed.). 2006. Ethnopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, & Anna Wierzbicka. 2004. Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for. Intercultural Pragmatics 1(2). 153–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka. 2014. Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across languages, cultures and domains. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Explicating the English lexicon of “doing” and “happening”. Functions of Language 23(2). 214–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Deborah. 2016. Bride-price, baskets and the semantic domain of ‘carrying’ in a matrilineal society. Oceanic Linguistics (in press). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Steven, M. Lynne Murphy, Carita Paradis, & Caroline Willners. 2012. Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions, and canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40(3). 385–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1988. Semantic theory. In Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey Volume I, 89–112. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 2015. Semantics and pragmatics of argument alternations. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 63–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor. 1988. Semantic description of lexical units in an explanatory combinatorial dictionary: Basic principles and heuristic criteria. International Journal of Lexicography 1(3). 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Explanatory combinatorial dictionary. In Giandomenico Sica (ed.), Open problems in linguistics and lexicography, 225–355. Monza: Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher.Google Scholar
Moerdijk, A. 2007. Definities, frames en semagrammen. Betekenis-beschrijving in het ANW. In A. Moerdijk, A. van Santen & R. Tempelaars (eds.), Leven met woorden, 63–75. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne. 2003. Semantic relations and the lexicon: antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obianim, Sam J. 1964. Eʋegbe ŋuti nunya [Ewe grammar]. Gbadzeme: Obianim & Partners.Google Scholar
Ofori, Kafui A. G. 2014. Nominalisation in Ewe. In Adika, Gordon S. K., Charles C. Asante (eds.), Multilingualism, language in education, and academic literacy: Applied linguistics research in the language centre, 159–179. Accra: Subsaharan Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Riemer, Nick. 2011. Introducing semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On monosemy: A study in linguistic semantics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Shmelev, Alexei. 2016. Semantic shifts as sources of enantiosemy. In Päivi Juvonen & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds.), The lexical typology of semantic shifts, 67–94. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Volume 3, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Lexical typologies. In Timothy A. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Volume 3 Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., 66–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ye, Zhengdao. 2014. Opposites in language and thought: A Chinese perspective. UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 320–338.Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich. 1928 Ewe-English dictionary. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1954. Wörterbuch der Ewe-Sprache. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. and Deborah L. Hill. 1995. When “GO” means “COME”. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2/3). 209–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. & Gertrud Schneider-Blum
2024. Chapter 2. Locative expressions and their semantic extensions in Tima. In Predication in African Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 235], ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Essegbey, James & Enoch O. Aboh
2024. Introduction. In Predication in African Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 235], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Afreh, Esther Serwaah & Harriet Appiah Kyeremeh
2023. The Discourse Functions of Antonyms in Faceless by Amma Darko. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Grimm, Nadine
2022. Documentary Approaches to Lexicography. In Current Issues in Descriptive Linguistics and Digital Humanities, ► pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Ameka, Felix K. & Deborah Hill
2020. The comparative semantics of verbs of ‘opening’: West Africa vs Oceania. In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.