Cover not available
Part of
Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva M. Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 219–240

Chapter 10
Dutch creoles compared with their lexifier

 | Aarhus University
In this chapter, we compare lexical and grammatical data from three Dutch-based creoles: Virgin Islands Creole Dutch, Berbice Creole and Skepi Dutch of Guyana. We consider the lexicons, as well as phonological and typological patterns, and both synchronic and diachronic comparisons are made. Typologically, Berbice Creole appears closer to Dutch than the other two creoles, but lexically it is the farthest from Dutch. For some of the analyses, phylogenetic software was used to visualize connections and distances between each of the creoles and the lexifier Dutch. The conclusion is that the three creoles came into being independently. From a diachronic perspective, the documented forms of Virgin Islands Creole Dutch show mostly a gradual move away from Dutch and toward a more creole-like profile in the 20th century.
Article outline
  • 10.1Introduction
  • 10.218th-Century Virgin Islands Creole Dutch and 20th-Century Virgin Islands Creole Dutch
  • 10.3Berbice Creole
  • 10.4Skepi Dutch Creole
  • 10.5The Dutch creoles: Lexical comparison
    • 10.5.1Origin of the roots
    • 10.5.2Comparison of the Dutch roots
    • 10.5.3Phonotactics of Dutch and Ijo words in Dutch creoles
  • 10.6Typological comparison
    • 10.6.1Three varieties of Virgin Islands Creole Dutch and Berbice Creole
    • 10.6.2Skepi, Berbice, and 20th-Century Virgin Islands Creole Dutch: Grammatical traits
  • 10.7Conclusions
  • Note
  • ?ack?
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 31 May 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.10bak
References (52)
References
Bakker, P. 1997. “A Language of our Own”. The Genesis of Michif – the Mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014. Three Dutch creoles in comparison. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(3): 191–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. εkε da boko jεrma. I am an Amerindian woman. A New View on the Genesis of Berbice Creole. Ms, Aarhus University.
Bakker, P., Post, M. & van der Voort, H. 1994. TMA particles and auxiliaries. In Pidgins and Creoles. An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15], J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. S. H. Smith (eds), 247–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A. & Plag, I. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26: 5–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartens, A. & Baker, P. (eds). 2012. Black Through White: African Words and Calques which Survived Slavery in Creoles and Transplanted European Languages. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma. Reprinted 2016, Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bøegh, K. Friis, Daval-Markussen, A. & Bakker, P. 2016. A phylogenetic analysis of stable structural features in West African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 45(1–2): 61–94.Google Scholar
Bruyn, A. & Veenstra, T. 1993. The creolization of Dutch. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 8: 29–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daval-Markussen, A. & Bakker, P. 2011. A phylogenetic networks approach to the classification of English-based Atlantic Creoles. English World-Wide 32: 115–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daval-Markussen, A. 2014. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2): 274–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Josselin de Jong, J. P. B. 1926. Het Huidige Negerhollandsch. Teksten en Woordenlijst. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
De Kleine, C. 2007. Negerhollands (Creole Dutch). In Comparative Creole Syntax, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 255–272. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G. J. 2011. Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harry, O. G. 2003. Kalabari-Ijo. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33(1): 113–120 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, F. 1998. 18e eeuws ‘liturgisch’ Negerhollands: Hoe creools zijn de Deense en Duitse lecten? In Mengelwerk voor Muysken. Voor Pieter C. Muysken bij zijn Afscheid van de Universiteit van Amsterdam, A. Bruyn & J. Arends (eds), 201–210. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Holm, J. & Patrick, P. L. (eds). 2007. Comparative Creole Syntax. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Hulsman, L. A. H. C. 2009. Nederlands Amazonia; Handel met Indianen 1580–1680. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Huson, D. H. & Bryant, D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in Evolutionary Studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, S. S. 1992. From OV to VO. Linguistic negotiation in the development of Berbice Dutch Creole. Lingua 88: 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Cliticization of pronouns in Berbice Dutch Creole and Eastern Ijo. In Atlantic Meets Pacific: A Global View of Pidginization and Creolization, F. X. Byrne & J. Holm (eds), 119–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1994. A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin: Mouton de Guyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. The invisible hand in creole genesis. Reanalysis in the formation of Berbice Dutch. In Complex Processes in New Languages [Creole Language Library 35], E. Aboh & N. S. H. Smith (eds), 115–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. The Ijo-derived lexicon of Berbice Dutch Creole: An a-typical case of African lexical influence. In Black Through White: African Words and Calques which Survived Slavery in Creoles and Transplanted European Languages, A. Bartens & P. Baker (eds), 135–144. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, S. 2013. Dutch creole in the Caribbean. In Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 3: Dutch, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 879–896. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015. Dutch Guiana. Demographics and living conditions and the emergence of Dutch creoles during the first one hundred years, 1580–1675. Journal of Language Contact 8(1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype. Vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Defining Creole. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (ed.). 1993. Africanisms in Afro-American Language Varieties. Athens GA: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C. 1995. Studying variation in older texts: Negerhollands. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 10: 335–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. The grammatical elements in Negerhollands: Loss, retention, reconstitution. In Germania et Alia: A Webschrift for Hans den Besten, J. Koster & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), 1–13. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C. & Smith, N. S. H. 1990. Question words in pidgin and creole languages. Linguistics 28: 883–903. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oldendorp, C. G. A. 1996[1767–1768]. Criolisches Wörterbuch. Erster zu vermehrender und wo nöthig zu verbessernder Versuch [1767/68]. Herausgegeben, eingeleitet und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Peter Stein. Sowie das anonyme, J. C. K. T. Kingo (J. C. Kingo) zugeschriebene, Vestindisk Glossarium. Herausgegeben, eingeleitet und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Hein van der Voort. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Robertson, I. E. 1983. The Dutch linguistic legacy and the Guyana/Venezuela border question. Boletín de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe 34: 75–97.Google Scholar
1989. Berbice and Skepi Dutch. A lexical comparison. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 105: 3–21.Google Scholar
Sabino, R. 2012. Language Contact in the Danish West Indies: Giving Jack his Jacket. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P. 1998. Western Linguistics: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. S. H. 1987. The Genesis of the Creole Languages of Surinam. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Smith, N. S. H., Robertson, I. E. & Williamson, K. 1987. The Ịjọ Element in Berbice Dutch. Language in Society 16: 49–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprauve, G. 2010. Some observations on validating Oldendorp in today’s Creolistics. In C. G. A. Oldendorp, Historie der caraibischen Inseln Sanct Thomas, Sanct Crux und Sanct Jan: Kommentarband, G. Meier, P. Stein, S. Palmié & H. Ulbricht (eds), 259–291. Herrnhut: Herrnhuter.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 2010a. Oldendorp und das Kreolische. In C. G. A. Oldendorp, Historie der caraibischen Inseln Sanct Thomas, Sanct Crux und Sanct Jan: Kommentarband, G. Meier, P. Stein, S. Palmié & H. Ulbricht (eds), 207–247. Herrnhut: Herrnhuter.Google Scholar
2010b. Einige Gespräche, die mündlich gehalten sind, woraus zu ersehen, was manche Schwarze, sonderlich verehlichte, für Streitigkeiten vor ihren Baas bringen, und sie von ihm schlichten lassen. In C. G. A. Oldendorp, Historie der caraibischen Inseln Sanct Thomas, Sanct Crux und Sanct Jan: Kommentarband, G. Meier, P. Stein, S. Palmié & H. Ulbricht (eds), 248–258. Herrnhut: Herrnhuter.Google Scholar
Stolz, T. 1986. Gibt es das kreolische Sprachwandelmodell? Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1987. Kreolistik und Germanistik: Niederländisch-basierte Sprachformen in Übersee. Linguistische Berichte 110: 283–318.Google Scholar
Sørensen, C. & Bakker P. 2003. Negerhollands reduplications: A diachronic view. In Twice as Meaningful. Reduplication in Pidgins, Creoles and Other Contact Languages, S. Kouwenberg (ed.), 265–269. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B. 2009. The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: A quantitative perspective. Lingua 119: 1643–1663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, M. 2013. Skepi-nederlands: Is dit geen moye taal? <[URL]> (10 June 2015).
Van Diggelen, M. 1978. Negro-Dutch. Amsterdam Creole Studies 2: 69–100.Google Scholar
Van Rossem, C. & van der Voort, H. 1996. Die Creol Taal, 250 Years of Negerhollands Texts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Sluijs, R. 2011. The Modal System of Negerhollands. MA thesis, Radboud University.Google Scholar
2014. Change or variation in historical data: A case study of the Virgin Islands Dutch Creole imperfective and prospective aspect marker. Linguistics in Amsterdam 7: 132–174.Google Scholar
<[URL]>, search for: NEHOL (5 September, 2016). <[URL]>
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Parkvall, Mikael & Bart Jacobs
2023. Returning a maverick creole to the fold: the Berbice Dutch enigma revisited. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Bart & Mikael Parkvall
2020. Skepi Dutch Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 35:2 ► pp. 360 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.