Cover not available
Part of
Atypical Language Development in Romance Languages
Edited by Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla, Lucía Buil-Legaz, Raúl López-Penadés, Victor A. Sanchez-Azanza and Daniel Adrover-Roig
[Not in series 223] 2019
► pp. 143–166

Real-time comprehension of sentences in children with SLI

Evidence from eye movements

 | Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
 | Universitat Oberta de Catalunya | Universitat de Barcelona
 | Universitat Oberta de Catalunya | Universitat de Barcelona
 | Universitat de Barcelona
 | Universitat de Barcelona
 | Universitat de Barcelona
Verbs play an essential role in enabling sentences to be interpreted rapidly in real time. The objective of this work is to investigate how verb information is used during real-time comprehension of sentences in Spanish. Twenty-five children (aged 5.3–8.2 years) with specific language impairment (SLI), fifty typically developing children (aged 3.3–8.2 years), and thirty-one normal adults participated in three eye-tracking experiments involving spoken language comprehension. Participants listened to simple sentences in the presence of four depicted objects, only one of which satisfied the semantic restrictions of the verb. Eye movements revealed that children with SLI were able to recognize and retrieve the meaning of the verb rapidly enough to anticipate the upcoming semantically appropriate referent.
Keywords: specific language impairment, eye movements, comprehension, sentence processing, verb semantics
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Experiment 1
    • Methodology
      • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • Experiment 2
    • Methodology
      • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • Experiment 3
    • Methodology
      • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • General discussion
  • Appendix
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 11 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.223.09and
References (29)
References
Andreu, L., Sanz-Torrent, M., Trueswell, J. 2012. Anticipatory sentence processing in children with SLI: Evidence from eye movements during listening. Applied Psycholinguistics 34, 5–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73, 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. 2008. Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 457–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bedore L., & Leonard L. (1998) Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 965–1220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bedore, L. M., & Leonard, L. B. (2001). Grammatical Morphology Deficits in Spanish-Speaking Children With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(4), 905–924.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. 1997. Uncommon understanding. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Boland, J. E. 2005. Visual arguments. Cognition 95, 237–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boland, J. E., and Boehm-Jernigan, H. (1998). Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 394, 684–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I., and Demonte, V. (eds.) (1999). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Carlson, G., & Tanenhaus, M. 1988. Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Thematic relations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, B. (1992). Saccadic reaction time: Implications for reading,dyslexia and visual cognition. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movementsand visual cognition: Scene perception and reading(pp. 31–45).New York: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L., and Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grinstead, J., De la Mora, J., Pratt, A. & Flores, B. 2009. Temporal interface delay and root non-finite verbs in Spanish-speaking children with Speciic Language Impairment: Evidence from the grammaticality choice task. In Hispanic Child Languages: Typical and Impaired Development [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 50], J. Grinstead (ed.), 239–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. 2003. Prediction and thematic information in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49, 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. 1998. Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., & Deevy, P. 2006. Cognitive and linguistic issues in the study of children with specific language disorders. In M. Traxler & M. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101, 676–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. K. J. 2007. On-line processing of wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 42(5), 557–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Infor-mation processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 372–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauner, G., & Koenig, J. P. 2000. Linguistic vs. conceptual sources of implicit agents in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 110–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery J. 2000. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43(2), 293–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J. W. 2002. Examining the nature of lexical processing in children with specific language impairment: Temporal processing or processing capacity deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics 23, 447–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J. W., Scudder, R. R., & Moore, C. 1990. Language-impaired children’s real time comprehension of spoken language. Applied Psycholinguistics 11, 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saslow, M. G. (1967). Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 1024–1029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. E., & Montgomery, J. W. 1995. Sentence processing in language impaired children under conditions of filtering and time compression. Applied Psycholinguistics 16, 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, S. (1998). Parsing as incremental restructuring. In Reanalysis in Sentence Processing, eds J. D. Fodor and F. Ferreira (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 327–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632–1634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C. 2008. Using eye movements as a developmental measure within psycholinguistics. In I. A. Sekerina, E. M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Language processing in children (pp. 73–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. 1994. Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (Eds.) Perspectives in sentence processing (pp. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar