Cover not available
Part of
“All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo and Gonzalo Camiña
[Not in series 237] 2021
► pp. 189–208

Chapter 10
“If you will take the trouble to inquire into it rather closely, I think you will find that it is not worth very much”

Authorial presence through conditionals and citation sequences in late modern English life sciences texts

ORCID logo | University of A Coruña
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The author in the text in late modern English scientific writing
  • 3.An overview on studies of authorial presence
  • 4.Conditionals and authorial presence
  • 5.Expressing opinions by means of citation sequences
  • 6.Corpus and methodology
  • 7.Analysis of the results
    • 7.1Conditionals
      • a.Relevance conditionals
      • b.Non-committal conditionals
      • c.Metalinguistic conditionals
    • 7.2Citation sequences
      • a.Isolated quotations
      • b.Citation sequences expressing agreement
      • c.Citation sequences expressing neutrality
      • d.Citation sequences expressing disagreement
  • 8.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Works cited
Published online: 10 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.237.10pue
References (44)
Works cited
Allen, Bryce; Qin, Jian and Lancaster, Frederik Wilfrid. 1994. Persuasive Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of References in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665–1990. Social Studies of Science, 24/2: 279–310.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2012. “An analysis of hedging in eighteenth century English astronomy texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel and Crespo, Begoña (eds.), Astronomy “playne and simple”. The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 199–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: typologically regular assymetries”. In Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Johanna (eds.), Evidentiality and the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 273–312.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1996. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25: 333–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsaglini-Castro, Anabella and Valcarce, Daniel. 2020. The Coruña Corpus Tool: Ten Years On. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 64: 13–19.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Evidentiality and the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 2003. ‘This mystery …’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2/4: 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27/3: 495–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Biber, Douglas. 1999. “Adverbial marking of Stance in speech and writing”. In Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff (eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56–73.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña. 2011. Persuasion markers and ideology in eighteenth century Corpus of English Philosophy Texts (CEPhiT). Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 17: 199–228.Google Scholar
. 2021. “Linguistic indicators of persuasion in female authors in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Lareo, Inés and Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.), “All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 147–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crompton, Peter. 1997. Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical aspects. English for Specific Purposes, 16: 271–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and Prediction: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2010. A corpus-based examination of English if-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn.) London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985. Language, Context and Text. Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 1993. “Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing”. In Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.), Register analysis. London: Pinter. 57–73.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff. 1999. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1996. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17/4: 433–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20/3: 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
John, Suganthi. 2013. “Identity Without the ‘I’: A Study of Citation Sequences and Writer Identity in Literature Review Sections of Dissertations”. In Tang, Ramona (ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL academic writers. London: Continuum. 186–203.Google Scholar
Lareo, Inés; Monaco, Leida Maria; Esteve-Ramos, María José and Moskowich, Isabel (comps.). 2020. The Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts (CELiST). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mele-Marrero, Margarita. 2019. “Neither I nor we. Inexplicit authorial voice in eighteenth century academic texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Crespo, Begoña; Puente-Castelo, Luis and Monaco, Leida Maria (eds.), Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 215–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel. 2016. “Pronouns as stance markers in the Coruña Corpus: an Analysis of the CETA, CEPhiT and CHET”. In Alonso-Almeida, Francisco (ed.), Stancetaking in Late Modern English Scientific Writing. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus. València: Universitat Politécnica de València. 73–91.Google Scholar
. 2021. “The making of CELiST, a bunch of disciplines”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Lareo, Inés and Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.), “All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10/1: 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parapar, Javier and Moskowich, Isabel. 2007. The Coruña Corpus Tool. Revista del Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural, 39: 289–290.Google Scholar
Puente-Castelo, Luis. 2017. On conditionality: A corpus-based study of conditional structures in Late Modern English scientific texts. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 11/2: 93–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1981. “Planes of Discourse”. In Rizvi, S. N. A. (ed.), The Two-Fold Voice: Essays in honour of Ramesh Mohan. Saltzburg: Universität Saltzburg. 70–89.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Pahta, Päivi. 1998. Vernacularisation of medical writing in English: A corpus-based study of Scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine, 3/2: 157–185.Google Scholar
Tang, Ramona and John, Suganthi. 1999. The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18: S23–S39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Yiyun, Ye. 1991. Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12/4: 365–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warchal, Krystyna. 2010. Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9: 140–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Monaco, Leida Maria
2021. Spotting register-internal variation in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century life sciences. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.