Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity

Causative constructions in English

ORCID logoMaarten Lemmens | Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille 3
ISBN 9789027236715 (Eur) | EUR 110.00
ISBN 9781556198823 (USA) | USD 165.00
ISBN 9789027275660 | EUR 110.00 | USD 165.00
Google Play logo
Fusing insights from cognitive grammar, systemic-functional grammar and Government & Binding, the present work elaborates and refines Davidse’s view that the English grammar of lexical causatives is governed by the transitive and ergative paradigms, two distinct models of causation (Davidse 1991, 1992). However, on the basis of extensive synchronic and diachronic data on verbs of killing (e.g. kill, execute, choke or drown), it is shown that ‘transitivity’ and ‘ergativity’ are not absolute but prototypical characteristics of verbs which may be overruled by the semantics of the construal in which they occur. The variable transitive or ergative character of the verbs reveals the complex interaction between the semantics of the construction and that of the verb. The diachronic analyses further illustrate how in the course of time verbs may change their paradigmatic properties, either temporarily (e.g. the ergativization of strangle, throttle and smother) or permanently (e.g. the ‘causativization’ of starve or the partial transitivization of abort). The analyses show that these changes are semantically well-motivated and further illustrate the cognitive reality of the two causative models. The work explores the experiential basis of the prototypical paradigmatic behaviour of verbs (e.g. the ergative predilection of the SUFFOCATE verbs). In addition, it attempts to shed more light on the semantics and restrictions of certain constructions, such as the medio-passive, the derivation of adjectives in –able, or the derivation of agentive nominals in –er.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 166] 1998.  xii, 268 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“[...] an interesting exploration into the fascinating domain of verbs, a step further on the way of lexical and constructional variation.”
Cited by

Cited by 39 other publications

Albrespit, Jean
2008. Atypical passives. Études anglaises Vol. 60:4  pp. 466 ff. DOI logo
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
2015. Pour une approche morphosémantique des noms d’action en -tion, -ment et -age1. Revue de sémantique et pragmatique 35-36:35-36  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
2023. Les noms suffixés en - eur en français : agentivité ou causativité ?. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 23:1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Broccias, Cristiano
2020. Falling to one’s death in multiple landscapes. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin & Hendrik De Smet
2020. Diachronic Corpora. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Devylder, Simon
2017. Cutting and Breaking the Embodied Self. CogniTextes :Volume 16 DOI logo
Girard-Gillet, Geneviève
2016. Atypical argument structures in French. In Atypical predicate-argument relations [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 33],  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Polysemy and synonymy. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Grammatical categorization: Subject–Auxiliary Inversion. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Constructions at Work, DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Overview. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Item-specific knowledge and generalizations. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Cross-linguistic generalizations in argument realization. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Island constraints and scope. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Why generalizations are learned. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. How argument structure constructions are learned. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele
2005. Surface generalizations. In Constructions at Work,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Goldberg, Adele E.
2020. Argument structure. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Guerrero Medina, Pilar
2017. Chapter 9. The English conative as a family of constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2003. Deverbal -ersuffixation as the equivalent of the clausal Subject-Finite unit. <i>WORD</i> 54:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Lemmens, Maarten & Kalyanamalini Sahoo
2017. Something's gotta go, something's gotta give: completion, mirativity and transitivity in odia light verb constructions. Studia Linguistica 71:3  pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Maier, John
2015. DISPOSITIONS AND ERGATIVITY. The Philosophical Quarterly 65:260  pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Malicka-Kleparska, Anna
Park, Sun Hee & Hyunwoo Kim
Perek, Florent & Maarten Lemmens
2010. Getting at the meaning of the English at-construction: the case of a constructional split. CogniTextes 5:Volume 5 DOI logo
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea & Barbara De Cock
2022. Taboo effects at the syntactic level. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Romain, Laurence
2017. Measuring the alternation strength of causative verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Romain, Laurence
2022. Putting the argument back into argument structure constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Slavcheva, Milena
2008. Thinking in Objects. In Text, Speech and Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5246],  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
SUGAWARA, Tsuyoshi
2016. The Syntactic and Semantic Structures of the English Causative <i>to</i>-infinitives. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences 22:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Valdovinos, Jorge I.
2022. Discourse, Concepts, and Critique: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. In Transparency and Critical Theory,  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Yaghoobi, Mahdi
2009. A critical discourse analysis of the selected Iranian and American printed media on the representations of Hizbullah-Israel war. Journal of Intercultural Communication 9:3  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
YAVAŞ, Deniz Ekin & Funda UZDU YILDIZ
2021. Contextualized Teaching of Different Senses of “al-” in Turkish as a Foreign Language. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 7:2  pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2005. Dedication. In Constructions at Work,  pp. ii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2005. Copyright Page. In Constructions at Work,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2006. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 742 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.


Main BIC Subject

CF: Linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  98036270 | Marc record