Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition
Editor
| Northumbria University
Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) is an exciting research enterprise in which scholars are concerned with the discursive reproduction of power and inequality. However, researchers in CDS are increasingly recognising the need to investigate the cognitive dimensions of discourse and context if they want to fully account for any connection between language, legitimisation and social action. This book presents a collection of papers in CDS concerned with various ideological discourses. Analyses are firmly rooted in linguistics and cognition constitutes a major focus of attention. The chapters, which are written by prominent researchers in CDS, come from a broad range of theoretical perspectives spanning pragmatics, cognitive psychology and cognitive linguistics. The book is essential reading for anyone working at the cutting edge of CDS and especially for those wishing to explore the central place that cognition must surely hold in the relationship between discourse and society.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 43] 2011. vii, 231 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
vii–viii
|
|
1–6
|
|
|
7–26
|
|
|
27–64
|
|
|
65–80
|
|
|
81–96
|
|
|
97–118
|
|
|
119–142
|
|
|
143–170
|
|
|
171–192
|
|
|
193–224
|
|
|
Notes on contributors
|
225–228
|
|
Index
|
229–232
|
“Christopher Hart’s edited collection is an important step forward in combining the cognitive turn and the critical turn in the study of human discourse. The rich developments that have been seen in this area over recent decades are ripe for scrutiny and consolidation. In this volume leading scholars in overlapping areas of enquiry show how discourse analysis, linguistics, cognitive science and social theory may be brought together in an enriched paradigm for critical studies.”
Paul Chilton, Lancaster University
“The book is essential reading for anyone working at the cutting edge of CDS and especially for those wishing to explore the central place that cognition must surely hold in the relationship between discourse and society.”
SirReadaLot 10.01.2011
“The papers in this volume offer new frameworks of critical discourse research from a broad cognitive perspective. [...] Without doubt, this volume can be used as a good reference for students and researchers who are interested in the theory and practice of CDS and cognitive linguistics.”
Xinzhang Yang, Xiamen University, PR China, in Discourse Studies, Vol. 15(5), 2013, pages 654-656
“CDA, and by extension CDS generally, is well served by this new collection of nine chapters, which make use of advances in the cognitive sciences to address both contextual and cognitive factors affecting language in use.”
Will Lingle, Kanda University of International Studies, Japan, in Discourse and Communication, Vol. 7:4 (2013). Pgs. 262-264
Cited by
Cited by 22 other publications
Barajas, Elías Domínguez
2015. Learning from mistakes: Using audio-recorded transcription errors to probe the sociocognitive paradigm in language processing.
Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 259 ff. 
Berger, Cynthia, Eric Friginal & Jennifer Roberts
2017. Representations of immigrants and refugees in US K-12 school-to-home correspondence: an exploratory corpus-assisted discourse study.
Corpora 12:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020.
In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26],
► pp. 155 ff.
Chang, Gordon C., Kerstin Lueck & Hugh B. Mehan
2013. Evidencing international threat.
Journal of Language and Politics 12:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
Edwards, Rachel
2013. The role of fear and envy in the discursive construction of the Beijing Olympics in British broadsheets.
Critical Discourse Studies 10:3 ► pp. 275 ff.
Fischer, Pascal & Christoph Schubert
2014. Introduction.
Journal of Language and Politics 13:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Harder, Peter
2014. National identity: Conceptual models, discourses and political change.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Hart, Christopher
2017. Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings of the (1984–1985) British Miners’ Strike: A multimodal analysis.
Discourse & Communication 11:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Hart, Christopher
2020.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
► pp. 186 ff.
Huang, Mimi
2020.
In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],
► pp. 1 ff.
Kopytowska, Monika
2015. IDEOLOGY OF ‘HERE AND NOW'.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 347 ff.
Langlotz, Andreas & Danièle Klapproth Muazzin
2014.
In The Expression of Inequality in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 248],
► pp. 105 ff.
Liu, Ke & Fang Guo
2016. A Review on Critical Discourse Analysis.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 6:5 ► pp. 1076 ff.
López Maestre, María D.
2020. Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt.
Complutense Journal of English Studies 28 ► pp. 191 ff.
McDonough, Terry
2020. Sam Browse. (2018) Cognitive Rhetoric
.
Journal of Language and Politics 19:2 ► pp. 256 ff.
Partington, Alan
2014. Mind the gaps.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Rasulić, Katarina
2020.
In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],
► pp. 111 ff.
Reisigl, Martin
2018.
In Handbuch Pragmatik,
► pp. 163 ff.
Waugh, Linda R., Theresa Catalano, Khaled Al Masaeed, Tom Hong Do & Paul G. Renigar
2016.
In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4],
► pp. 71 ff.
Zhen-qiang, Fan
2013. Book review: Christopher Hart, Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse.
Discourse & Communication 7:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Žmavc, Janja
2018. Rhetorical Ethos: an Attempt at Linguistic Pragmatic Perspective on Classical Rhetoric.
Studia Historica Slovenica 18 (2018):2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General