Writing Assessment in Higher Education

Editors
Bert Weltens | VU University Amsterdam
Jos Hornikx | Radboud University of Nijmegen
ORCID logoWander Lowie | University of Groningen
Petra Poelmans | Fontys University of Applied Sciences
Rebecca L. Present-Thomas | VU University Amsterdam
[Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2:1] 2013.  ix, 132 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Contributors
vii
Preface
ix
Articles
Writing assessment in higher education: Making the framework work
Marcus Callies, Ekaterina Zaytseva and Rebecca L. Present-Thomas
1–15
Assessing the use of sophisticated EFL writing: A longitudinal study
Pieter de Haan and Monique van der Haagen
16–27
UniTIE: Towards a transparent description of learning outcomes for academic writing
Paula Haapanen, Suzy McAnsh, Eva Braidwood and Robert Hollingsworth
28–42
Fleshing out CEFR descriptors at C1 and above for the assessment of academic writing in departments of English at Austrian universities
Helen Heaney
43–56
Defining proficiency: A comparative analysis of CEF level classification methods in a written learner corpus
Rebecca L. Present-Thomas, Bert Weltens and John H.A.L. de Jong
57–76
EMBEDding the CEFR in academic writing assessment: A case study in training and standardization
Kevin Haines, Nicole Schmidt, Petra Jansma and Wander Lowie
77–91
Information Structure: The final hurdle? The development of syntactic structures in (very) advanced Dutch EFL writing
Lieke Verheijen, Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
92–107
An investigation into the writing construct(s) measured in Pearson Test of English Academic
Ying Zheng and Shaida Mohammadi
108–125
Research note
The Corpus of Academic Learner English (CALE): A new resource for the assessment of writing proficiency in the academic register
Marcus Callies and Ekaterina Zaytseva
126–132
Subjects