How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated Data

Speech acts and beyond

| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027200471 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027264299 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This book introduces a methodology and research tool (DART) that make it possible to carry out advanced corpus pragmatics research using dialogue corpora enriched with pragmatics-relevant annotations. It first explores the general use of spoken corpora for pragmatics research, as well as issues revolving around their representation and annotation, and then goes on to describe the resources required for such an annotation process. Based on data from three different corpora, ranging from highly constrained, task-oriented, ones (SPAADIA Trainline & Trains 93) to unconstrained dialogues (Switchboard), it next presents an in-depth discussion and illustration of the potential contributions of syntax, semantics, and semantico-pragmatics towards pragmatic force. This is followed by a description of the largely automatic annotation process itself, and finally an analysis of how a set of more than 110 potential speech acts defined in DART contributes towards establishing the specific communicative characteristics of the three corpora.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 84]  2018.  xiv, 294 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of tables
ix–x
Table of figures
xi–xii
Abbreviations
xiii–xiv
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–16
Chapter 2. Computer-based data in pragmatics
17–56
Chapter 3. Data, tools and resources
57–87
Chapter 4. The syntax of spoken language units
89–154
Chapter 5. Semantics and semantico-pragmatics
155–185
Chapter 6. The annotation process
187–211
Chapter 7. Speech acts: Types, functions, and distributions across the corpora
213–275
Chapter 8. Conclusion
277–280
Appendix A. The DART speech-act taxonomy (version 2.0)
281–286
References
285–292
Index
293–294
“The book presents an innovative methodology for corpus-pragmatic studies. The advantages that DART has can inspire further development, as discussed above, which will not only contribute substantially to the on-going development of Corpus Pragmatics, but also to the field of Pragmatics in general. As such it is highly recommended.”
References

References

Aarts, Bas & McMahon, April
(eds) 2006The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, Svenja
2008Corpus and Context: Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 30]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, Svenja & Carter, Ronald
2013Spoken Corpus Linguistics: From Monomodal to Multimodal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1996Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Rühlemann, Christoph
(eds) 2015Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, James
1995Natural Language Understanding, 2nd edn. Redwood City CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Allen, James & Core, Mark
Alexandersson, Jan, Buschbeck-Wolf, Bianka, Fujinami, Tsutomu, Kipp, Michael, Koch, Stephan, Maier, Elisabeth, Reithinger, Norbert, Schmitz, Birte & Siegel, Melanie
1997Dialogue Acts in VERBMOBIL-2. VM-Report 204, DFKI GmbH.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1990Spoken English and the dictionary. In The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research, Jan Svartvik (ed.). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Anne, Bader, Miles, Bard, Ellen, Boyle, Elizabeth, Doherty, Gwyneth, Garrod, Simon, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, McAllister, Jan, Miller, Jim, Sotillo, Catherine, Thompson, Henry & Weinert, Regina
1991The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech 32: 351–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Ion & Aretoulaki, Maria
2003Natural language interaction. In Mitkov (ed.), 629–648.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2014AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net/
Ariel, Mira
2008Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Sue & Rundell, Michael
2008The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Heritage, John
1984/2006Jefferson’s transcript notation. In Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.). Cambridge: CUP. Reprinted in Adam Jaworski & Nicholas Coupland (eds) 2006 The Discourse Reader, 2nd edn, 158–165. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw
1962How to do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Barnbrook, Geoff
1996Language and Computers: A Practical Introduction to the Computer Analysis of Language. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Beesley, Kenneth & Karttunen, Lauri 2003Finite State Morphology. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Benson, James & Greaves, William
1981 Field of discourse: Theory and application. Applied Linguistics II(1).Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randi
1998Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
1997Approches de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Bradley, Neil
1998The XML Companion. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
2000Lexical-functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George
1983Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Burnard, Lou
1995The Text Encoding Initiative: An overview. In Leech, Myers & Thomas (eds), 69–81.Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod
1996Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics, Gregory Trauth & Kerstin Kazzazi (trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam, Holloway King, Tracy, Niño, María-Eugenia & Segond, Frédérique
1999A Grammar Writer’s Cookbook. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus
2013Advancing the research agenda of interlanguage pragmatics: The role of learner corpora. In Romero-Trillo (ed.), 9–36. Crossref.Google Scholar
Carletta, Jean, Isard, Amy, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth & Anderson, Anne
1996HCRC Dialogue Structure Coding Manual. HCRC Technical Report 82. Edinburgh: Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Carroll, John
2003Parsing. In Mitkov (ed.), 233–248.Google Scholar
Carstensen, Kai-Uwe, Ebert, Christian, Endriss, Cornelia, Jekat, Susanne, Klabunde, Ralf & Langer, Hagen
(eds) 2004Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie: Eine Einführung, 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1984How people use adverbial clauses. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Claudia Brugman & Monika Macaulay (eds), 437–449. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1993Prosodic and functional units of language. In Edwards & Lampert (eds).Google Scholar
1995Adequacy, user-friendliness, and practicability in transcribing. In Leech, Myers & Thomas (eds), 54–61.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cloeren, Jan
1999Tagsets. In van Halteren (ed.), 37–54.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
2006Clause types. In Aarts & McMahon (eds), 72–92. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2009Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Core, Mark, Ishizaki, Masato, Moore, Johanna, Nakatani, Christine, Reithinger, Norbert, Traum, David & Tutiya, Syun
1998The Report of the Third Workshop of the Discourse Resource Initiative. Chiba: Chiba University and Kazusa Academia Hall.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm
(ed)).1977An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1992Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
2000Corpus di Italiano Parlato. Firenze: Accademia delle Crusca.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela 2014Syntactic properties of spontaneous speech in the language into act theory: Data on Italian complements and relative clauses. In Raso & Mello (eds), 365–410.Google Scholar
Crichton, Charles
(Dir.) 1988A Fish Called Wanda. [Motion Picture]. UK/USA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2009The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 195–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Steven
1988Grammatical category disambiguation by statistical optimization. Computational Linguistics 14(1): 31–39.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jane
1993Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In Edwards & Lampert (eds), 3–31.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jane & Lampert, Martin
(eds) 1993Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, Bergen, Benjamin & Zinken, Jörg
(eds) 2007The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Eileen
(ed.) 2007Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word: Corpus Research from Phrase to Discourse. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flöck, Ilka & Geluykens, Ronald
2015Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: A quantitative contrastive study of directives in spontaneous and elicited discourse. In Romero-Trillo (ed.), 7–37.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill & Hunston, Susan
1992Analysing everyday conversation. In Coulthard (ed.), 123–161.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kučera, Henry
1979Manual of information to accompany a standard sample of present-day edited American English, for use with digital computers. First published 1964, revised and augmented 1979. Providence RI: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Towards a theory of discourse markers. In Fischer (ed.), 189–204.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey & McEnery, Anthony
(eds) 1997Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey & Sampson, Geoffrey
(eds) 1987The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-based Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Geis, Michael
1995Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction: Toward a Theory of Conversational Competence. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Dafydd
2000Computational lexicography. In van Eynde & Gibbon (eds), 1–39.
Gibbon, Dafydd, Mertins, Inge & Moore, Roger
((eds) 2000Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Language Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie, & Granger, Sylviane
(eds) 2010Louvain International Database of Spoken Interlanguage (LINDSEI). Louvain: UCL Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Godfrey, John & Holliman, Edward 1997Switchboard-1 Release 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. https://​Catalog​.ldc​.upenn​.edu​/LDC97S62 (14 September 2017).
Goldberg, Adele
2007[2003]Constructions: A new theoretical approach to Language. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, Vyvyan Evans, Benjamn Bergen & Jorg Zinken (eds). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1996Transparent vision. In Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson (eds), 370–404.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas
2015Stance markers. In Aijmer & Rühlemann (eds), 219–248.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael & Carroll, Susanne
1978Language and Situation. London: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A.
(eds) 1988Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John
1997Mind Design II, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hazadiah, M.D.
1991The Structure of Topic. PhD Thesis: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Heeman, Peter & Allen, James
1995The TRAINS 93 Dialogues. Technical Report. University of Rochester, Rochester NY, USA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2015 Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 88: 88–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs Erhard, Kübler, Sandra, Kordoni Valia & Müller Frank
2000Robust chunk parsing for spontaneous speech. In Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation, Wolfgang Wahlster (ed.), 163–182. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry
2006Abduction in natural language understanding. In Horn & Ward (eds), 724–741.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence & Ward, Gregory
2006[2004]The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
2007Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 6(2): 173–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Nancy
2007Preparation and analysis of linguistic corpora. In Schreibmann, Siemens & Unsworth (eds), 289–305.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam & Coupland, Nikolas
(eds) 2006The Discourse Reader, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jekat, Susanne, Klein, Marion, Maier, Elisabeth, Maleck, Ilona, Mast, Marion, Quantz, Joachim
1995Dialogue Acts in VERBMOBIL. VM-Report 65, DFKI GmbH.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig
1995The approach of the Text Encoding Initiative to the encoding of spoken discourse. In Leech, Myers & Thomas (eds), 82–98.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey & Goodluck, Helen
1978Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen corpus of British English, for use with digital computers. Oslo: Department of English, Oslo University.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas
1993The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19(5): 435–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1611–1635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W.
1998 And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiation strategies. In Jucker & Ziv (eds), 171–202.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael (eds) 1998Discourse Markers: Description and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Discourse markers: Introduction. In Jucker & Ziv (eds), 1–12.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel
2006Pragmatics and computational linguistics. In Horn & Ward (eds), 578–604.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel & Martin, James
2000Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel, Shriberg, Liz & Biasca, Debra
1997Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shallow-Discourse-Function Annotation Coder Manual. http://​www​.stanford​.edu​/~jurafsky​/ws97​/ics​-tr​-97​-02​.ps
Kallen, Jeffrey & Kirk, John
2012SPICE-Ireland: A User’s Guide. Queen’s University Belfast, Trinity College Dublin, and Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Klein, Marion
1999Standardisation efforts on the level of dialogue act in the MATE Project. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop “Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging”, 35–41.Google Scholar
Knight, Dawn, Evans, David, Carter, Ronald & Adolphs, Svenia
2009HeadTalk, HandTalk and the corpus: Towards a framework for multi-modal, multi-media corpus development. Corpora 4(1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Dawn
2011Multimodality and Active Listenership: A Corpus Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Knowles, Gerald
1987Patterns of Spoken English: An Introduction to English Phonetics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Eyes, Elizabeth
1997Syntactic annotation: treebanks. In R. Garside, G. Leech & T. McEnery (eds). Corpus annotation: linguistic information from computer text corpora. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Myers, Greg & Thomas, Jenny
(eds) 1995Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-up and Application. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul & Wilson, Andrew
2001Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Weisser, Martin, Wilson, Andrew & Grice, Martine
2000Survey and guidelines for the representation and annotation of dialogue. In Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Language Systems, Dafydd Gibbon, Inge Mertins & Roger K. Moore (eds). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Weisser, Martin
2003Generic speech act annotation for task-oriented dialogues. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference [UCREL Technical Papers 16], Dawn Archer, Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson & Tony McEnery (eds). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Leicher, Sheryl & Maynard, Carson
2007Pragmatic annotation of an academic spoken corpus for pedagogical purposes. In Fitzpatrick (ed.), 107–115.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael
1998Taming the spoken language: Genre theory and pedagogy. The Language Teacher Online. http://​www​.jalt publications​.org​/tlt​/files​/98​/sep​/mccarthy​.html (1 September 2009).
Mann, William & Thompson, Sandra 1987Rhetorical structure theory: Description and construction of text structures. In Natural Language Generation: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics, Gerard Kempen (ed.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher & Schütze, Hinrich
1999Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Mitchell, Santorini, Beatrice & Marcinkiewicz, Mary Ann
1993Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19. (page references refer to downloaded version).Google Scholar
Marshall, Ian
1987Tag selection using probabilistic methods. In Garside, Leech & Sampson (eds), 42–56.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, Christian M. I. M. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1988The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In Haiman & Thompson (eds), 275–330.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Wilson, Andrew
1996Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio
2006Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob
1993Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, James & Weinert, Regina
1998Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1974/1997A framework for representing knowledge. Reprinted in Mind Design II, John Haugeland (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mitkov, Ruslan
(ed.) 2003The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo
2011Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2): 479–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald
2002International Corpus of English Markup Manual for Spoken Texts. London: University College London, Survey of English Usage. http://​ice​-corpora​.net​/ice​/manuals​.htm (12 November 2016).
Niemann, Heinrich, Nöth, Elmar, Harbeck, Stefan & Warnke, Volker
1997Topic Spotting Using Subword Units. Verbmobil-Report 205. F.A.U. Erlangen-Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A.
(eds) 1996Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Clancy, Brian & Adolphs, Svenja
2011Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ooi, Vincent
1998Computer Corpus Lexicography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank
1990Modality and the English Modals, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001Mood and Modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan
1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Power, Richard
1979The organization of purposeful dialogues. Linguistics 17 (1–2): 105–52.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana
(eds) 2014Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roark, Brian & Sproat, Richard
2007Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús (ed.) 2013Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013: New Domains and New Methodologies. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jésus
(ed.) 2015Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph
2006Coming to terms with conversational grammar: ‘Dislocation’ and ‘dysfluency’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4): 385–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 697–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salton, Gerard & Buckley, Christopher
1988Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management 24(5): 513–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice
1995Part of Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project, 3rd revision, 2nd printing. ftp://​ftp​.cis​.upenn​.edu​/pub​/treebank​/doc​/tagguide​.ps​.gz
Schank, Roger & Abelson, Robert
1977Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schreibmann, Susan, Siemens, Ray & Unsworth, John
(eds) 2007A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter
1985Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories: An Introduction to Government-Binding Theory, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, and Lexical-Functional Grammar [Lecture Notes 3]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude
1948A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656, July, October 1948 page no. refers to reprint downloadable from http://​plan9​.bell labs​.com​/cm​/ms​/what​/shannonday​/shannon1948​.pdf (9 July 2008).
Shannon, Claude & Weaver, Warren
1963The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Chicago IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Rita, Briggs, Sarah, Ovens, Janine & Swales, John
2002The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
1992Priorities in discourse analysis. In Coulthard (ed.), 79–88.Google Scholar
2005Corpus and text – Basic principles. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, Martin Wynne (ed.), 1–16. Oxford: Oxbow Books: http://​ota​.ox​.ac​.uk​/documents​/creating​/dlc​/chapter1​.htm (26 October 2016).
Sinclair, John & Coulthard, Malcolm
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John & Mauranen, Anna
2006Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating Speech and Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1995Relevance, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperberg-McQueen, Michael & Burnard, Lou
(eds) 1994Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (TEI P3). Chicago IL: Association for Computers and the Humanities/Association for Computational Linguistics/Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard
1992Morphology and Computation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita 1994An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
(ed.) 1990The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Szabó, Zoltán
(ed.) 2005Semantics versus Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jasper & Carletta, Jean
1996The SGML Representation of the HCRC Map Task Corpus. Technical Report, Human Communication Research Centre, 2 Buccleugh Place, Edinburgh EH8 8LW, Scotland.Google Scholar
van Eynde, Frank & Gibbon, Dafydd
2000Lexicon Development for Speech and Language Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Halteren, Hans
(ed.) 1999Syntactic Wordclass Tagging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, Cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Weisser, Martin
2002Determining generic elements in dialogue. Language, Information and Lexicography 12–13: 131–156. 25th December 2003 Institute of Language and Information Studies, Yonsei University.Google Scholar
2003SPAACy – A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(1): 63–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Tagging dialogues in SPAACy. In Traitement Automatique des Langues: Le traitement automatique des corpus oraux, Jean Véronis (ed.), Vol. 45–n° 2/2004. 131–157.Google Scholar
2009Essential Programming for Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2010Annotating Dialogue Corpora Semi-Automatically: A Corpus-Based Approach to Pragmatics. Habilitation thesis, University of Bayreuth.Google Scholar
2015Speech act annotation. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds), 84–113. Cambridge: CUP. Chapter Crossref.Google Scholar
2016aPractical Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction to Corpus-Based Language Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bDART – The dialogue annotation and research tool. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(2): 355–388. Crossref.Google Scholar
2016cProfiling agents & callers: A dual comparison across speaker roles and British vs. American English. In Talking at Work: Corpus-based Explorations of Workplace Discourse, Lucy Pickering, Eric Friginal & Shelley Staples (eds), 99–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter Crossref.Google Scholar
2016dUpdating the LINDSEI for pragmatic analysis and evaluation. Paper presented at the Third Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference (APCLC 2016) , on 22nd October.
2017Annotating the ICE Corpora pragmatically – Preliminary issues & steps. ICAME Journal 41: 181–214. Crossref.Google Scholar
West, Michael
1953A General Service List of English Words. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2000Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles, and Ends. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
2006Relevance Theory. In Horn & Ward (eds), 607–632.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Cresti, Emanuela
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94],  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Kostadinova, Viktorija, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Marco Wiemann, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise, Shawnea Sum Pok Ting, Juliana Souza Da Silva, Beke Hansen & And Ian Cushing
2020. IEnglish Language. The Year's Work in English Studies Crossref logo
Weisser, Martin
2019. The DART annotation scheme: form, appliability & application. Studia Neophilologica 91:2  pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009030 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Pragmatics
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2017056561 | Marc record