Aspects of Literary Comprehension
A cognitive approach
Author
Given the fact that there are widely different types of text, it is unlikely that every text is processed in the same way. It is assumed here that for each text type, proficient readers have developed a particular cognitive control system, which regulates the basic operations of text comprehension. The book focuses on the comprehension of literary texts, which involves specific cognitive strategies that enable the reader to respond flexibly to the indeterminacies of the literary reading situation.
The study relies heavily on methods and theoretical conceptions from cognitive psychology and presents the results of experiments carried out with real readers. The results are not only relevant to research problems in literary theory, but also to the study of discourse comprehension in general.
[Utrecht Publications in General and Comparative Literature, 29] 1993. ix, 190 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
1. Framing literary comprehension | pp. 1–40
-
2. Reading rate and surface-structure representation | pp. 41–60
-
3. Levels of representation | pp. 61–86
-
4. Processing spatial descriptions in fiction | pp. 87–121
-
5. Violation of consensus reality | pp. 123–140
-
6. Towards a model of literary comprehension | pp. 141–171
-
Appendices | pp. 183–186
-
Index | pp. 187–190
Cited by
Cited by 68 other publications
Banerjee, Konika, Omar S. Haque & Elizabeth S. Spelke
2013. Melting Lizards and Crying Mailboxes: Children's Preferential Recall of Minimally Counterintuitive Concepts. Cognitive Science 37:7 ► pp. 1251 ff. 
Bauer, Matthias, Judith Glaesser, Augustin Kelava, Leonie Kirchhoff & Angelika Zirker
2022. ‘When most I wink, then’ – what? Assessing the comprehension of literary texts in university students of English as a second language. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:3 ► pp. 345 ff.
Blohm, Stefan, Stefano Versace, Sanja Methner, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
2022. Reading Poetry and Prose: Eye Movements and Acoustic Evidence. Discourse Processes 59:3 ► pp. 159 ff.
Brown, Carol M.
1998. L2 Reading: An Update on Relevant L1 Research. Foreign Language Annals 31:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Bruhn, Mark J.
Carlsson, Maj Asplund, Márta Fülüp & Ference Marton
2001. Peeling the Onion: Student teachers' of literary understanding. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Caro, Marina Ramos
2016. Testing audio narration: the emotional impact of language in audio description. Perspectives 24:4 ► pp. 606 ff.
Castiglione, Davide
2017. Difficult poetry processing: Reading times and the narrativity hypothesis. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2 ► pp. 99 ff.
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Organisms of Difficulty: The Data. In Difficulty in Poetry, ► pp. 169 ff.
Castiglione, Davide
2019. New Coordinates of Difficulty: An Interdisciplinary Framework. In Difficulty in Poetry, ► pp. 65 ff.
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Genes of Difficulty: The Indicators. In Difficulty in Poetry, ► pp. 95 ff.
de Kreij, Mark
2014. Review of Sanford & Emmott (2012): Mind, Brain and Narrative. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 300 ff.
Elfenbein, Andrew
2006. Cognitive Science and the History of Reading. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 121:2 ► pp. 484 ff.
Fokkema, Douwe
1993. A European canon of literature?. European Review 1:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Fokkema, Douwe
2008. Dialogue and Research: Cross-cultural Literary Studies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 3:1 ► pp. 16 ff.
Forceville, Charles
1999. Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996). Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 8:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Gambino, Renata & Grazia Pulvirenti
2019. Neurohermeneutics A Transdisciplinary Approach to Literature. Gestalt Theory 41:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Graesser, Arthur C., Shane S. Swamer & Xiangen Hu
1997. Quantitative discourse psychology. Discourse Processes 23:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
Guy, Josephine M, Kathy Conklin & Jennifer Sanchez-Davies
2018. Literary stylistics, authorial intention and the scientific study of literature: A critical overview. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:3 ► pp. 196 ff.
Hakala, Christopher M.
1999. Accessibility of spatial information in a situation model. Discourse Processes 27:3 ► pp. 261 ff.
Hall, Geoff
2000. Book Review: The year’s work in stylistics: 1999. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 9:4 ► pp. 361 ff.
Hall, Geoff
2007. Stylistics in Second Language Contexts: A Critical Perspective. In Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners, ► pp. 3 ff.
Hall, Geoff
2009. Texts, readers — and real readers. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 18:3 ► pp. 331 ff.
Hansen, Preben & Jussi Karlgren
2005. Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment. Journal of Documentation 61:5 ► pp. 623 ff.
Henschel, Sofie & Thorsten Roick
2013. Zusammenhang zwischen Empathie und dem Verstehen literarischer Texte. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 45:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Henschel, Sofie, Thorsten Roick, Martin Brunner & Petra Stanat
2013. Leseselbstkonzept und Textart: Lassen sich literarisches und faktuales Leseselbstkonzept trennen?*. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 27:3 ► pp. 181 ff.
HERMAN, ERIC & MICHAEL J. LEESER
2022. The Relationship Between Lexical Coverage and Type of Reading Comprehension in Beginning L2 Spanish Learners. The Modern Language Journal 106:1 ► pp. 284 ff.
Hersh, Reuben
2013. Mathematical Intuition: Poincaré, Pólya, Dewey. In The Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) Condition, ► pp. 9 ff.
Heyne, Nora, Maximilian Pfost & Hanna Maria Heiler
2021. Affektive Perspektivenübernahme beim Verstehen literarischer Texte im Grundschulalter und ihre Bedeutung für Leseeinstellungen und Textverstehen. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung / Discourse. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Research 16:4-2021 ► pp. 496 ff.
Horiba, Yukie
2000. Reader Control in Reading: Effects of Language Competence, Text Type, and Task. Discourse Processes 29:3 ► pp. 223 ff.
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2015. Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Roel M. Willems
2015. Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use, ► pp. 135 ff.
Jiang, Qiuxia
2009. Aesthetic Progression in Literary Translation. Meta 53:4 ► pp. 860 ff.
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2023. Bücher am Bildschirm. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 53:3 ► pp. 761 ff.
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021. Chapter 12. Postscript. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 217 ff.
Lin, Hui Wei & Mei Hua Hsu
2013. Exploring the Mystery of Literary Reading: A Psychophysiological Perspective. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity ► pp. 459 ff.
Mangen, Anne & Don Kuiken
McCarthy, Kathryn S.
McCarthy, Philip M., Shinobu Watanabe & Travis A. Lamkin
2012. The Gramulator. In Applied Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 312 ff.
McCarthy, Philip M., Shinobu Watanabe & Travis A. Lamkin
2014. The Gramulator. In Cross-Cultural Interaction, ► pp. 1673 ff.
Meier, Christel, Thorsten Roick, Sofie Henschel, Jörn Brüggemann, Volker Frederking, Adelheid Rieder, Volker Gerner & Petra Stanat
2017. An Extended Model of Literary Literacy. In Competence Assessment in Education [Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment, ], ► pp. 55 ff.
Miall, David S.
2015. Temporal Aspects of Literary Reading. In Investigations Into the Phenomenology and the Ontology of the Work of Art [Contributions To Phenomenology, 81], ► pp. 15 ff.
Miall, David S. & Don Kuiken
1999. What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes 28:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Milin, Petar, Filip Nenadić & Michael Ramscar
Nishihara, Takayuki
2015. Achievement Tests for Literary Reading in General EFL Reading Courses. In Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom, ► pp. 115 ff.
Persson, Per
2003. Understanding Cinema,
Peskin, Joan
2010. The Development of Poetic Literacy During the School Years. Discourse Processes 47:2 ► pp. 77 ff.
Pérez, Francisco Antonio & Carolina Vargas-Daza
2019. Shaping Narrative Writing Skills Through Creating Picture Books. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal :19 ► pp. 148 ff.
Rosa, Lotta-Sofia La & Aku-Ville Lehtimäki
Schilcher, Anita & Christel Meier
2021. Verwandtschaften, Wahlverwandtschaften und andere Beziehungskisten: Deutschdidaktik als transdisziplinäres Fach. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 51:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Schmitz, Anke, Cornelia Gräsel & Björn Rothstein
2017. Students’ genre expectations and the effects of text cohesion on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing 30:5 ► pp. 1115 ff.
Schneider, Ralf
2005. Hypertext narrative and the reader: a view from cognitive theory. European Journal of English Studies 9:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Brandl, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2021. Experiencing literature on the e‐reader: the effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading 44:2 ► pp. 319 ff.
Schwabe, Annika, Fabienne Lind, Lukas Kosch & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2022. No Negative Effects of Reading on Screen on Comprehension of Narrative Texts Compared to Print: A Meta-analysis. Media Psychology 25:6 ► pp. 779 ff.
Semino, Elena & Jonathan Culpeper
Semino, Elena & Gerard Steen
2008. Metaphor in Literature. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ► pp. 232 ff.
Steen, Gerard
1999. Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes 28:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Sternberg, Meir
2003. Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes (II). Poetics Today 24:3 ► pp. 517 ff.
Sternberg, Meir
2003. Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes (I). Poetics Today 24:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Van Peer, W.
1997. “High”/“Low” Cultural Products and Their Social Functions. Empirical Studies of the Arts 15:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
van Peer, Willie
2007. Review Article: Towards a new narratology. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 16:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Vassallo, Odette
2016. Chapter 5. Enhancing responses to literary texts with L2 learners. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24], ► pp. 83 ff.
Worthmann, Friederike
1998. Literarische Kanones als Lektüremacht. Systematische Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Kanon(isierung) und Wert(ung). In Kanon Macht Kultur, ► pp. 9 ff.
Zwaan, Rolf A. & Herre van Oostendorp
1993. Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension?. Discourse Processes 16:1-2 ► pp. 125 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Literature & Literary Studies
Main BIC Subject
DSB: Literary studies: general
Main BISAC Subject
LIT000000: LITERARY CRITICISM / General