Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality
Editors
This volume addresses problems of semantics regarding the analysis of tense and aspect (TA) markers in a variety of languages, including Arabic, Croatian, English, French, German, Russian, Thai, and Turkish. Its main interest goes out to epistemic uses of such markers, whereby epistemic modality is understood as indicating “a degree of compatibility between the modal world and the factual world” (Declerck). All contributions, moreover, tackle these problems from a more or less cognitive point of view, with some of them insisting on the need to provide a unifying explanation for all usage types, temporal and non-temporal, and all of them accepting the premise that the semantics of TA categories essentially refers to subjective, rather than objective, concerns. The volume also represents one of the first attempts to gather accounts of TA marking (in various languages) that are explicitly set within the framework of Cognitive Grammar. Ultimately, this volume aims to contribute to establishing an awareness that modal meaning elements are directly relevant to the analysis of the grammar of time.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 29] 2011. ix, 319 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 7 July 2011
Published online on 7 July 2011
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
List of contributors | pp. vii–viii
-
Acknowledgments | pp. ix–x
-
Introduction: Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modalityFrank Brisard and Adeline Patard | pp. 1–18
-
Part I. Theoretical foundations
-
The definition of modalityRenaat Declerck | pp. 21–44
-
The English present: Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacyRonald W. Langacker | pp. 45–86
-
The organization of the German clausal grounding systemElena Smirnova | pp. 87–100
-
Grounding in terms of anchoring relations: Epistemic associations of ‘present continuous’ marking in TurkishCeyhan Temurcu | pp. 109–134
-
Part II. Descriptive application: Cognitive Grammar
-
Some remarks on the role of the reference point in the construal configuration of “more” and “less” grounding predicationsElena Smirnova and Tanja Mortelmans | pp. 137–158
-
New current relevance in Croatian: Epistemic immediacy and the aoristMateusz-Milan Stanojević and Renata Geld | pp. 159–180
-
Aspect as a scanning device in natural language processing: The case of ArabicLazhar Zanned | pp. 181–214
-
Part III. Descriptive application: Other cognitive approaches
-
Imperfective aspect and epistemic modalityRonny Boogaart and Radoslava Trnavac | pp. 217–248
-
Communicating about the past through modality in English and ThaiKatarzyna M. Jaszczolt and Jiranthara Srioutai | pp. 249–278
-
The epistemic uses of the English simple past and the French imparfait: When temporality conveys modalityAdeline Patard | pp. 279–310
-
Name Index | pp. 311–314
-
Subject Index | pp. 315–319
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Koss, Tom, Astrid De Wit & Johan van der Auwera
Harrison, Chloe
Bartley, Leanne & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2016. “Well, I think that my argument is…,” or modality in a learner corpus of English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General